Factors that contribute to post-treatment follow-up care for survivors of childhood cancer

被引:37
|
作者
Barakat, Lamia P. [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Lisa A. [1 ,2 ]
Szabo, Margo M. [1 ]
Hussey, Heather M. [1 ]
Bunin, Greta R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp, Div Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Pediat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Pediatric oncology; Survivorship; Long-term survival; LONG-TERM SURVIVORS; HEALTH-CARE; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS; ADOLESCENT CANCER; ADULT SURVIVORS; SYMPTOMS; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; PARENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-011-0206-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
As children complete cancer treatment and enter survivorship, follow-up care is critical to monitor for and treat relapses, secondary malignancies, and late effects of treatment. Relative contributions of cancer and treatment variables and sociodemographic factors in engagement with follow-up care are not fully understood. This study aimed to identify risk factors for inadequate follow-up care. The sample included a cohort of 173 children (birth-18 years) diagnosed with cancer in 2004 and treated at a children's hospital. Sociodemographics (gender, patient current age, ethnic minority status, distance from hospital, type of insurance), cancer and treatment variables (patient age at diagnosis, type of cancer, treatment modality, time off treatment, relapse, on clinical trial protocol), and follow-up care through 2009 were gathered via the hospital tumor registry and medical charts. In simultaneous linear regression analysis (full model: F(12, 160) = 3.49, R (2) = 0.21, p = 0.001), having a liquid tumor (p < 0.05), presence of relapse (p = 0.009), and shorter distance from hospital (p = 0.006) predicted total number of follow-up visits between completion of treatment and 5 years post-diagnosis. In simultaneous logistic regression analysis (full model: chi (2) (12, N = 173) = 53.27, p < 0.001), being male (p = 0.077), having a brain tumor (p = 0.055), longer time off treatment (p = 0.004), and greater distance from hospital (p = 0.003) decreased the likelihood of completing a follow-up or survivorship visit between completion of treatment and 5 years post-diagnosis. In simultaneous linear regression analysis (full model: F(12, 160) = 4.52, R (2) = 0.25, p = 0.001), non-White race (p = 0.001) and having public insurance (p = 0.002) predicted total number of no shows between completion of treatment and 5 years post-diagnosis. These results extend knowledge of health disparities in pediatric cancer follow-up care suggesting that cancer and treatment-related variables (type of cancer, relapse, number of treatment modalities) and sociodemographic factors (distance from treatment center, non-White race, public insurance) are important predictors of engagement in follow-up care. Survivors at risk for poor engagement may benefit from targeted interventions designed to increase likelihood of follow-up care.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors that contribute to post-treatment follow-up care for survivors of childhood cancer
    Lamia P. Barakat
    Lisa A. Schwartz
    Margo M. Szabo
    Heather M. Hussey
    Greta R. Bunin
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2012, 6 : 155 - 162
  • [2] FACTORS INFLUENCING ADHERENCE TO FOLLOW-UP CARE IN CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVORS
    Ater, Joann
    Cruz, Scott Cody
    Xu, Angela H.
    Okcu, M. Fatih
    Bondy, Melissa
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2010, 55 (05) : 942 - 942
  • [3] Post-treatment follow-up care for cancer survivors: Is psychosocial care incorporated within existing models, and if not, why?
    Aziz, N.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (09) : S270 - S271
  • [4] FOLLOW-UP CARE FOR SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD-CANCER
    FOCHTMAN, D
    [J]. NURSE PRACTITIONER FORUM-CURRENT TOPICS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 6 (04): : 194 - 200
  • [5] FOLLOW-UP AND CARE OF CHILDHOOD-CANCER SURVIVORS
    MEADOWS, AT
    [J]. HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1991, 26 (02): : 99 - &
  • [6] Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence
    Howell, D.
    Hack, T. F.
    Oliver, T. K.
    Chulak, T.
    Mayo, S.
    Aubin, M.
    Chasen, M.
    Earle, C. C.
    Friedman, A. J.
    Green, E.
    Jones, G. W.
    Jones, J. M.
    Parkinson, M.
    Payeur, N.
    Sabiston, C. M.
    Sinclair, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2012, 6 (04) : 359 - 371
  • [7] Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence
    D. Howell
    T. F. Hack
    T. K. Oliver
    T. Chulak
    S. Mayo
    M. Aubin
    M. Chasen
    C. C. Earle
    A. J. Friedman
    E. Green
    G. W. Jones
    J. M. Jones
    M. Parkinson
    N. Payeur
    C. M. Sabiston
    S. Sinclair
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2012, 6 : 359 - 371
  • [8] Who Provides Psychosocial Follow-Up Care for Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors? A Survey of Medical Oncologists and Primary Care Physicians
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Alfano, Catherine M.
    Leach, Corinne R.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Stefanek, Michael E.
    Rowland, Julia H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (23) : 2897 - 2905
  • [9] FOLLOW-UP OF SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD CANCER
    LI, FP
    [J]. CANCER, 1977, 39 (04) : 1776 - 1778
  • [10] Childhood cancer survivors’ primary care and follow-up experiences
    Anne C. Kirchhoff
    Roberto E. Montenegro
    Echo L. Warner
    Jennifer Wright
    Mark Fluchel
    Antoinette M. Stroup
    Elyse R. Park
    Anita Y. Kinney
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014, 22 : 1629 - 1635