Soil quality indicators for reclaimed minesoils in southeastern Ohio

被引:72
|
作者
Shukla, MK
Lal, R
Ebinger, M
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, FAES, Sch Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM USA
关键词
soil bulk density; soil structure; water infiltration; hydraulic conductivity; soil texture; principle component analysis; discriminant analysis;
D O I
10.1097/01.ss.0000117785.98510.0f
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil quality indices are useful for ascertaining temporal changes in soil properties in relation to land use and management, especially for drastically disturbed soils, and for designing the best management systems for minesoil reclamation. Soil quality indices were developed by analyzing physical and chemical properties of the minesoils in Jackson and Vinton counties, Ohio, reclaimed in 1975 and 1976. Soil properties were also assessed for the adjoining unmined soil and the spoil. The principle component analysis (PCA) was performed on 20 physical and chemical soil properties, separately for each experimental site, for 0- to 10-cm depth. The PCA performed with correlation matrix grouped 20 measured soil attributes into four distinct principle components (PCs) for each site. The PCs were related to measured soil properties, based on their communality estimates. The factors identified were (i) bulk density, (ii) water infiltration, (iii) aggregate size, and (iv) soil nitrogen for the Jackson site and (i) bulk density, (ii) water infiltration, (iii) organic carbon, and (iv) porosity for the Vinton site. These factors were assessed with respect to the specific soil functions and were designated as soil quality indicators. The discriminant analysis of retained PCs showed that the bulk density factor was the most discriminating and water stable aggregation the most dominating common measured soil attribute or the dynamic soil quality indicator for both sites. Other soil quality indicators varied in the order soil bulk density > field water capacity > clay concentration. These factors monitored over time are indicators of change in soil quality, whether aggrading, degrading, or stable.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical and hydrological characteristics of reclaimed minesoils in southeastern Ohio
    Shukla, MK
    Lal, R
    Underwood, J
    Ebinger, M
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (04) : 1352 - 1359
  • [2] Temporal changes in soil organic carbon concentration and stocks in reclaimed minesoils of southeastern Ohio
    Skukla, MK
    Lal, R
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 170 (12) : 1013 - 1021
  • [3] Spatial variability of total soil carbon and nitrogen stocks for some reclaimed minesoils of Southeastern Ohio
    Nyamadzawo, G.
    Shukla, M. K.
    Lal, R.
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 19 (03) : 275 - 288
  • [4] Soil organic carbon stock for reclaimed minesoils in northeastern Ohio
    Sukla, MK
    Lal, R
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 16 (04) : 377 - 386
  • [5] Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils in Ohio
    Akala, VA
    Lal, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (06) : 2098 - 2104
  • [6] Soil properties and carbon sequestration of afforested pastures in reclaimed minesoils of Ohio
    Ussiri, D. A. N.
    Lal, R.
    Jacinthe, P. A.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (05) : 1797 - 1806
  • [7] Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils
    Akala, V
    Lal, R
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AND POLICIES FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN SOIL, 2002, : 297 - 304
  • [8] PHOSPHORUS REQUIREMENTS IN SOIL SOLUTION OF VEGETABLE CROPS FOR RECLAIMED MINESOILS
    SWIADER, JM
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1980, 15 (03) : 380 - 380
  • [9] SOIL CARBON POOLS OF RECLAIMED MINESOILS UNDER GRASS AND FOREST LANDUSES
    Chatterjee, A.
    Lal, R.
    Shrestha, R. K.
    Ussiri, D. A. N.
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 20 (03) : 300 - 307
  • [10] Carbon sequestration in reclaimed minesoils
    Ussiri, DAN
    Lal, R
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (03) : 151 - 165