Ultrasound for the evaluation of soft tissue foreign bodies before and after the addition of fluid to the surrounding interstitial space in a cadaveric model

被引:3
|
作者
Saul, Turandot [1 ]
Siadecki, Sebastian D. [1 ]
Rose, Gabriel [1 ]
Berkowitz, Rachel [1 ]
Drake, Aaran B. [1 ]
Delone, Noah [1 ]
Avitabile, Nicholas [2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, Mt Sinai West Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 1000 10th Ave, New York, NY 10019 USA
[2] St Barnabas Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY USA
来源
关键词
ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound may be used to facilitate foreign body (FB) localization and removal. We hypothesized that injection of normal saline adjacent to an FB may make it easier to detect. Methods: The study was performed on one embalmed human cadaver. Potential FB sites were created of wood (24), metal (24), and null (24). Two sonographers evaluated each of the 72 sites both before and after a 25-gauge needle was inserted into each incision and 3 cc of normal saline was injected. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated both before and after injection of normal saline. Binomial tests were used to determine the statistical significance of FB detection before and after injection. A 2-tailed Student's t test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 methods. Results: Preinjection, 116 (81%) of the 144 interpretations (P <= .001) were correct in their assessment of whether or not an FB was present, with a sensitivity of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-88%) and a specificity of 79% (95% CI, 65%-90%). Postinjection, 119 (83%) of these 144 interpretations (P <= .001) were correct in their assessment of whether or not an FB was present, with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 77%-92%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI, 63%-88%). This difference was not significant (P = .08; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.01). Discussion: Ultrasound was reasonably accurate, sensitive, and specific in identifying 1-cm metal and wood FBs. Although accuracy and sensitivity did improve after normal saline injection, this difference was not significant. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1779 / 1782
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND FOR THE DETECTION OF SOFT TISSUE FOREIGN BODIES: A CADAVERIC STUDY
    Crystal, Chad S.
    Masneri, David A.
    Hellums, John S.
    Kaylor, David W.
    Young, Scott E.
    Miller, Michael A.
    Levsky, Marc E.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (04): : 377 - 380
  • [2] Ultrasound Evaluation of Soft-Tissue Foreign Bodies by US Army Medics
    Driskell, David L.
    Gillum, J. Barton
    Monti, Jonathan D.
    Cronin, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2018, 26 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [3] Ultrasound Accurately Identifies Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in a Live Anesthetized Porcine Model
    Saul, Turandot
    Siadecki, Sebastian D.
    Rose, Gabriel
    Berkowitz, Rachel
    Matilsky, Danielle
    Godbold, James
    Moshier, Erin
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (08) : 950 - 954
  • [4] Human or animal? Finding the best ultrasound soft tissue model for foreign body evaluation
    Daniel Jafari
    KJ Cody
    AJ Dean
    FS Shofer
    KY Jenq
    JI Fischer
    NL Panebianco
    Critical Ultrasound Journal, 4 (Suppl 1)