Comparison of landscape features in organic and conventional farming systems

被引:33
|
作者
van Mansvelt, JD [1 ]
Stobbelaar, DJ [1 ]
Hendriks, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ Agr, Dept Ecol Agr, NL-6709 Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
biodiversity; rural landscape; multifunctionality; landscape production; organic agriculture; cross compliance;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00060-7
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Four organic (biodynamic) farms coupled with conventional farms from their neighbourhood in The Netherlands, Germany and Sweden, and 3 organic farms and 4 conventional farms from the West Friesean region in The Netherlands were evaluated to compare their impact on landscape diversity. Materials used were soil-, water-, land use- and land-property maps, interviews with the farmers, repeated (several days) visits to the farms, allowing to make temporal transects, photographs and pictures of the farm-couples and their surroundings. Presence of diverse land use types, woody elements (plantings) and visual elements (vertical and horizontal coherence, colours and forms) were analysed. The results show that the diversity of landscapes and farming system was greater in organic farms. It regards to the land-use types, crops, livestock, plantings (hedges, solitary shrubs and trees), flora, sensorial information (more forms, colours, smells, sounds, spatial experiences) and labour (more on-farm processing and more people involved). Also, all forms of coherence were found to be greater in organic farms. In terms of landscape diversity the organic types of agriculture have a good potential for positive contributions to a sustainable agro-landscape management. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:209 / 227
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of landscape features in organic and conventional farming systems
    van, Mansvelt, J.D.
    Stobbelaar, D.J.
    Hendriks, K.
    Landscape and Urban Planning (Amsterdam), 1998, 41 (3-4): : 209 - 227
  • [2] Damage control inputs: a comparison of conventional and organic farming systems
    Guan, ZF
    Lansink, AO
    Wossink, A
    Huirne, R
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 (02) : 167 - 189
  • [3] Critique of methodologies for the comparison of organic and conventional farming systems.
    Lee, H
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 229 : U70 - U70
  • [4] A comparison of soil and water properties in organic and conventional farming systems in England
    Hathaway-Jenkins, L. J.
    Sakrabani, R.
    Pearce, B.
    Whitmore, A. P.
    Godwin, R. J.
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 27 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [5] Comparison of rice grain qualities as influenced by organic and conventional farming systems
    Nakagawa, S
    Tamura, Y
    Ogata, Y
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 69 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [6] Energy balance comparison of organic and conventional farming
    Dalgaard, T
    Kelm, M
    Wachendorf, M
    Taube, F
    Dalgaard, R
    ORGANIC AGRICULTURE: SUSTAINABILITY, MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2003, : 127 - 138
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF THE LEACHABLE INORGANIC NITROGEN-CONTENT IN ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL FARMING SYSTEMS
    KRISTENSEN, SP
    MATHIASEN, J
    LASSEN, J
    MADSEN, HB
    REENBERG, A
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 1994, 44 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [8] Comparison of the Efficiency and Use of Energy in Organic and Conventional Farming in Spanish Agricultural Systems
    Alonso, Antonio M.
    Guzman, Gloria J.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2010, 34 (03): : 312 - 338
  • [9] Dairy cow nutrition in organic farming systems. Comparison with the conventional system
    Orjales, I
    Lopez-Alonso, M.
    Miranda, M.
    Alaiz-Moreton, H.
    Resch, C.
    Lopez, S.
    ANIMAL, 2019, 13 (05) : 1084 - 1093
  • [10] A comparison of soil and environmental quality under organic and conventional farming systems in New Zealand
    Condron, LM
    Cameron, KC
    Di, HJ
    Clough, TJ
    Forbes, EA
    McLaren, RG
    Silva, RG
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (04) : 443 - 466