Neuro-ophthalmologic outcomes of standard versus hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of AVPM

被引:1
|
作者
Zach, Leor [1 ,4 ]
Agami, Amir [4 ,5 ]
Furman, Orit [1 ]
Attia, Moshe [3 ,4 ]
Cohen, Zvi [3 ,4 ]
Mizrachi, Iris Ben-Bassat [2 ]
Tam, Guy [2 ]
Zibly, Zion [3 ,4 ]
Nissim, Ouzi [3 ,4 ]
Spiegelmann, Roberto [3 ,4 ]
Huna-Baron, Ruth [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sheba Med Ctr, Neurooncol Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Sheba Med Ctr, Neuroophthalmol Serv, Ramat Gan, Israel
[3] Sheba Med Ctr, Neurosurg Dept, Ramat Gan, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Galilee Med Ctr, Nahariyya, Israel
关键词
MULTISESSION RADIOSURGERY; NORMAL TISSUE; MENINGIOMAS; TOLERANCE; NERVES;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-021-01879-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Most anterior visual pathway meningiomas (AVPM) are benign and slow-growing, but these tumors may affect visual functions, including visual acuity (VA) and visual field (VF). Due to location, most are treated non-surgically by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), aiming to prevent tumor progression and visual functions deterioration. Unfortunately, FSRT in itself may affect visual functions. The current preferred treatment regimen (in terms of safety and effectiveness) is undetermined. While most cases are treated with conventional fractionation (cFSRT)-50.4-54 Gy in 28-30 fractions of 1.8-2 Gy, advances in technology have allowed shortening of total treatment length to hypofractionation (hSRT)-25-27 Gy in 3-5 fractions of 5-9 Gy. Our aim was to evaluate the association of radiotherapy regimen for treating AVPM (cFSRT vs. hSRT) with visual function outcomes (VA, VF) at the last neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of AVPM cases treated at Sheba Medical Center during 2004-2015. We compared cFSRT and hSRT regimens regarding visual function (VA, VF) outcomes at the last neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation. VA was determined by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR). VF was determined by the mean deviation (MD). A clinically relevant change in VA was defined as 0.2 LogMAR. Results 48 patients (13 receiving hSRT, 35 receiving cFSRT) were included, with a median follow-up of 55 months. No significant difference was evident regarding LogMAR or MD of involved eyes at the last evaluation. Six (17%) patients in the cFSRT group experienced clinically relevant VA deterioration in the involved eye, compared with six (46%) in hSRT (p = 0.06). Conclusion Our findings, using comprehensive and meticulous investigation of visual outcomes, suggest that hSRT may be associated with higher risk for VA and VF deterioration in AVPM especially in ONSM. We recommend the use of cFSRT for ONSM.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuro-ophthalmologic outcomes of standard versus hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of AVPM
    Leor Zach
    Amir Agami
    Orit Furman
    Moshe Attia
    Zvi Cohen
    Iris Ben-Bassat Mizrachi
    Guy Tam
    Zion Zibly
    Ouzi Nissim
    Roberto Spiegelmann
    Ruth Huna-Baron
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [2] Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Re-Irradiation Outcomes For Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Yilmaz, Melek Tugce
    Kahvecioglu, Alper
    Mohammadipur, Sepideh
    Zorlu, Faruk
    Oge, Kamil
    Kertmen, Neyran
    Yazici, Gozde
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S747 - S749
  • [3] Could VMAT Provide Advantages in the Treatment of Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy?
    Webster, G. J.
    Rowbottom, C. G.
    Lee, L. W.
    Faivre-Finn, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S684 - S684
  • [4] Comparative Study of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Narwariya, Abhinav
    Dhakar, Mhendr
    Jatav, Jagannath
    Prajapati, Raju
    Bayer, Sujata
    Moosa, Shajiya Sarwar
    Shaikh, Mohammad Habeebur Raheman
    Ali, Mohammed Taher
    Ahmad, Arafat
    Begum, Yousuf
    Hiware, Sanket D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [5] A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO COMPARE HYPO-FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY IN CARCINOMA BREAST
    Kumar, Sunny
    Singh, Sharad
    Prasad, S. N.
    Korde, Mangesh
    Elhence, Aditya
    Shakya, Vaibhav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2019, 10 (04): : 2071 - 2078
  • [6] Effect of patient variation on standard- and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Xiong, W
    Li, J
    Ma, CM
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (07): : 1483 - 1492
  • [7] Investigation of irradiated volume in linac-based brain hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy
    Ruschin, Mark
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Soliman, Hany
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Tsao, May
    Yeboah, Collins
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    Chugh, Brige
    Kiss, Alex
    Lee, Young
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12
  • [8] Investigation of irradiated volume in linac-based brain hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy
    Mark Ruschin
    Arjun Sahgal
    Hany Soliman
    Sten Myrehaug
    May Tsao
    Collins Yeboah
    Arman Sarfehnia
    Brige Chugh
    Alex Kiss
    Young Lee
    Radiation Oncology, 12
  • [9] Effect of patient variation on standard- and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Xiong, W
    Li, J
    Ma, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S583 - S583
  • [10] Hypo-fractionated Radiotherapy (HF-RT) Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy (CF-RT) for Glioblastoma
    Zemskova, Oksana
    Pedachenko, Eugene
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Rades, Dirk
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (07) : 3121 - 3128