Development of Rating Curves: Machine Learning vs. Statistical Methods

被引:6
|
作者
Rozos, Evangelos [1 ]
Leandro, Jorge [2 ]
Koutsoyiannis, Demetris [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Environm Res & Sustainable Dev, Athens 15236, Greece
[2] Univ Siegen, Fac 4, Res Inst Water & Environm, Sch Sci & Technol, Paul Bonatz Str 9-11, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
[3] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Water Resources & Environm Engn, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
stage-discharge relationship; rating curve; machine learning; multilayer perceptron; unsupervised learning; clustering; DBSCAN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology9100166
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Streamflow measurements provide valuable hydrological information but, at the same time, are difficult to obtain. For this reason, discharge records of regular intervals are usually obtained indirectly by a stage-discharge rating curve, which establishes a relation between measured water levels to volumetric rate of flow. Rating curves are difficult to develop because they require simultaneous measurements of discharge and stage over a wide range of stages. Furthermore, the shear forces generated during flood events often change the streambed shape and roughness. As a result, over long periods, the stage-discharge measurements are likely to form clusters to which different stage-discharge rating curves apply. For the identification of these clusters, various robust statistical approaches have been suggested by researchers, which, however, have not become popular among practitioners because of their complexity. Alternatively, various researchers have employed machine learning approaches. These approaches, though motivated by the time-dependent nature of the rating curves, handle the data as of stationary origin. In this study, we examine the advantages of a very simple technique: use time as one of the machine learning model inputs. This approach was tested in three real-world case studies against a statistical method and the results indicated its potential value in the development of a simple tool for rating curves suitable for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disclosure Sentiment: Machine Learning vs. Dictionary Methods
    Frankel, Richard
    Jennings, Jared
    Lee, Joshua
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (07) : 5514 - 5532
  • [2] Machine Learning vs. Statistical Model for Prediction Modelling: Application in Medical Imaging Research
    Ryu, Leeha
    Han, Kyunghwa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 83 (06): : 1219 - 1228
  • [3] Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality
    Shin, Sheojung
    Austin, Peter C.
    Ross, Heather J.
    Abdel-Qadir, Husam
    Freitas, Cassandra
    Tomlinson, George
    Chicco, Davide
    Mahendiran, Meera
    Lawler, Patrick R.
    Billia, Filio
    Gramolini, Anthony
    Epelman, Slava
    Wang, Bo
    Lee, Douglas S.
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (01): : 106 - 115
  • [4] Comparative analysis of forecasting for air cargo volume: Statistical techniques vs. machine learning
    Jiaming Liu
    Lina Ding
    Xiaoyu Guan
    Jiao Gui
    Jianbin Xu
    [J]. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2020, 2 (4): : 243 - 255
  • [5] KNN vs. Bluecat-Machine Learning vs. Classical Statistics
    Rozos, Evangelos
    Koutsoyiannis, Demetris
    Montanari, Alberto
    [J]. HYDROLOGY, 2022, 9 (06)
  • [6] The use of parametric vs. nonparametric tests in the statistical evaluation of rating scales
    Munzel, U
    Bandelow, B
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1998, 31 (06) : 222 - 224
  • [7] Machine learning and statistical MAP methods
    Kon, M
    Plaskota, L
    Przybyszewski, A
    [J]. Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, Proceedings, 2005, : 441 - 445
  • [8] Performance vs. learning curves: what is motor learning and how is it measured?
    A. Dubrowski
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 1290 - 1290
  • [9] Machine Learning Methods for Local Motion Planning: A Study of End-to-End vs. Parameter Learning
    Xu, Zifan
    Xiao, Xuesu
    Warnell, Garrett
    Nair, Anirudh
    Stone, Peter
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY, SECURITY, AND RESCUE ROBOTICS (SSRR), 2021, : 217 - 222
  • [10] Machine learning vs. hybrid machine learning model for optimal operation of a chiller
    Park, Sungho
    Ahn, Ki Uhn
    Hwang, Seungho
    Choi, Sunkyu
    Park, Cheol Soo
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 209 - 220