Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches

被引:100
|
作者
Camarretta, Nicolo [1 ,2 ]
Harrison, Peter A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bailey, Tanya [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Potts, Brad [1 ,2 ]
Lucieer, Arko [3 ]
Davidson, Neil [4 ]
Hunt, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, ARC Training Ctr Forest Value, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Technol Environm & Design, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] Greening Australia, Mt Nelson, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Structural complexity; Structural attributes; Restoration success; Effectiveness monitoring; Remote sensing; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES; AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA; BIOMASS ESTIMATION; TREE HEIGHT; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; VEGETATION CONDITION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RESTORING FORESTS; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; INDIVIDUAL TREES;
D O I
10.1007/s11056-019-09754-5
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
With the demand for, and scale of, ecological restoration increasing globally, effectiveness monitoring remains a significant challenge. For forest restoration, structural complexity is a recognised indicator of ecosystem biodiversity and in turn a surrogate for restoration effectiveness. Structural complexity captures the diversity in vegetation elements, from tree height to species composition, and the layering of these elements is critical for dependent organisms which rely upon them for their survival. Traditional methods of measuring structural complexity are costly and time-consuming, resulting in a discrepancy between the scales of 'available' versus 'needed' information. With advancements in both sensors and platforms, there exists an unprecedented opportunity for landscape-level effectiveness monitoring using remote sensing. We here review the key literature on passive (e.g., optical) and active (e.g., LiDAR) sensors and their available platforms (spaceborne to unmanned aerial vehicles) used to capture structural attributes at the tree- and stand-level relevant for effectiveness monitoring. Good cross-validation between remotely sensed and ground truthed data has been shown for many traditional attributes, but remote sensing offers opportunities for assessment of novel or difficult to measure attributes. While there are examples of the application of such technologies in forestry and conservation ecology, there are few reports of remote sensing for monitoring the effectiveness of ecological restoration actions in reversing land degradation. Such monitoring requires baseline data for the restoration site as well as benchmarking the trajectory of remediation against the structural complexity of a reference system.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 596
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches
    Nicolò Camarretta
    Peter A. Harrison
    Tanya Bailey
    Brad Potts
    Arko Lucieer
    Neil Davidson
    Mark Hunt
    [J]. New Forests, 2020, 51 : 573 - 596
  • [2] Remote Sensing Image Restoration Based on an improved Landweber Iterative Method for Forest Monitoring and Management
    Lv, Xizhi
    Zuo, Zhongguo
    Wang, Zhihui
    Li, Li
    Huang, Jing
    [J]. 2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND DEVELOPMENT (IWRED 2018), 2018, 153
  • [3] Adaptive measures: integrating adaptive forest management and forest landscape restoration
    Spathelf, Peter
    Stanturf, John
    Kleine, Michael
    Jandl, Robert
    Chiatante, Donato
    Bolte, Andreas
    [J]. ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2018, 75 (02)
  • [4] Adaptive measures: integrating adaptive forest management and forest landscape restoration
    Peter Spathelf
    John Stanturf
    Michael Kleine
    Robert Jandl
    Donato Chiatante
    Andreas Bolte
    [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2018, 75
  • [5] The effectiveness of lidar remote sensing for monitoring forest cover attributes and landscape restoration
    Almeida, D. R. A.
    Stark, S. C.
    Chazdon, R.
    Nelson, B. W.
    Cesar, R. G.
    Meli, P.
    Gorgens, E. B.
    Duarte, M. M.
    Valbuena, R.
    Moreno, V. S.
    Mendes, A. F.
    Amazonas, N.
    Goncalves, N. B.
    Silva, C. A.
    Schietti, J.
    Brancalion, P. H. S.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 438 : 34 - 43
  • [6] Remote sensing of forest degradation: a review
    Gao, Yan
    Skutsch, Margaret
    Paneque-Galvez, Jaime
    Ghilardi, Adrian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
  • [7] LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure
    Lim, K
    Treitz, P
    Wulder, M
    St-Onge, B
    Flood, M
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 27 (01): : 88 - 106
  • [8] Assessment of forest restoration with multitemporal remote sensing imagery
    Cheng-Chien Liu
    Yi-Hsin Chen
    Mei-Heng Margaret Wu
    Chiang Wei
    Ming-Hsun Ko
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [9] Assessment of forest restoration with multitemporal remote sensing imagery
    Liu, Cheng-Chien
    Chen, Yi-Hsin
    Wu, Mei-Heng Margaret
    Wei, Chiang
    Ko, Ming-Hsun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [10] Integration of remote sensing and forest management through spatial analysis of forest structure for sustainable development
    Fournier, RA
    Ung, CH
    [J]. 27TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 1998, : 672 - 675