Multi-Terminal Collaborative Control Decision-Making Mechanism Based on Blockchain

被引:0
|
作者
Qiu Guoliang [1 ]
Zheng Qiwen [1 ]
Hu Xing [2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Power Supply Bur Co LTD, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Terminal perception; Walras equilibrium; multi-terminal resource co-allocation; optimization;
D O I
10.1109/CyberC.2019.00047
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this paper, aiming at the problem of unreliability and incentive of terminal perception process, this paper constructs a multi-terminal collaborative control decision-making mechanism based on blockchain. Through the task publishers and workers to make decisions on the blockchain platform according to their own wishes, the algorithm to maximize the overall revenue is realized. Firstly, the problem model of the relationship between work area, task and user is abstracted. Based on the problem model, the revenue function of each task and user is proposed, which quantitatively depicts the benefits that tasks and user decisions bring to them. Finally, according to Walras equilibrium theory, a distributed multi-terminal resource co-allocation model is established and a reasonable pricing algorithm is designed. Ensure that each terminal maximizes the supply and demand balance of tasks in each area in the process of maximizing decision-making for its own interests to maximize the overall revenue. Finally, the implementation and results of the algorithm are analyzed by MATLAB simulation tool, and the mechanism is verified and compared with common algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probabilistic Blockchains: A Blockchain Paradigm for Collaborative Decision-Making
    Salman, Tara
    Jain, Raj
    Gupta, Lav
    2018 9TH IEEE ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2018, : 457 - 465
  • [2] Optimal Decision-making Method for Restoration of Interconnected Distribution Networks With Multi-terminal Soft Open Point
    Lu J.
    Yang X.
    Zhang Y.
    Weng G.
    Wang L.
    Xu Z.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2023, 43 (12): : 4554 - 4567
  • [3] Power Data Credible Decision-Making Mechanism Based on Federated Learning and Blockchain
    Li, Xin
    Shang, Fangjian
    Yao, Yanli
    Zheng, Tianren
    GAME THEORY FOR NETWORKS, GAMENETS 2022, 2022, 457 : 73 - 82
  • [4] Stability Analysis and Control of Decision-Making of Miners in Blockchain
    Toda, Kosuke
    Kuze, Naomi
    Ushio, Toshimitsu
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2022, E105A (04) : 682 - 688
  • [5] Contrasting Voting, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, and Collaborative Decision-Making Using Election Results
    Elste, James R.
    Schwieger, Travis
    Croasdell, David T.
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 3960 - 3970
  • [6] MULTI-TERMINAL BDDS IN MICROPROCESSOR-BASED CONTROL
    Dvorak, Vaclav
    ICINCO 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS, VOL 3, 2010, : 140 - 145
  • [7] COLLABORATIVE MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    CHRISTENSEN, C
    LARSON, JR
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [8] Collaborative decision-making process
    Akiyama, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 45422 - 45422
  • [9] The collaborative decision-making framework
    Andrle, Stephen J.
    D'Ignazio, Janet
    TR News, 2009, (260): : 17 - 23
  • [10] Collaborative decision-making in multi-buy food purchases
    Anderson, Craig G.
    Reid, Louise A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 216 : 520 - 527