A General Approach to Sensitivity Analysis for Mendelian Randomization

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Weiming [1 ]
Ghosh, Debashis [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Instrumental variable; Causal inference; Sensitivity analysis; Unmeasured confounding; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; SEQUENCING DATA; BONE; CONFOUNDERS; REGRESSION; CANCER; BIAS; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s12561-020-09280-5
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mendelian Randomization (MR) represents a class of instrumental variable methods using genetic variants. It has become popular in epidemiological studies to account for the unmeasured confounders when estimating the effect of exposure on outcome. The success of Mendelian Randomization depends on three critical assumptions, which are difficult to verify. Therefore, sensitivity analysis methods are needed for evaluating results and making plausible conclusions. We propose a general and easy to apply approach to conduct sensitivity analysis for Mendelian Randomization studies. Bound et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 90:443-450. 10.2307/2291055, 1995) derived a formula for the asymptotic bias of the instrumental variable estimator. Based on their work, we derive a new sensitivity analysis formula. The parameters in the formula include sensitivity parameters such as the correlation between instruments and unmeasured confounder, the direct effect of instruments on outcome and the strength of instruments. In our simulation studies, we examined our approach in various scenarios using either individual SNPs or unweighted allele score as instruments. By using a previously published dataset from researchers involving a bone mineral density study, we demonstrate that our proposed method is a useful tool for MR studies, and that investigators can combine their domain knowledge with our method to obtain bias-corrected results and make informed conclusions on the scientific plausibility of their findings.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 55
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A General Approach to Sensitivity Analysis for Mendelian Randomization
    Weiming Zhang
    Debashis Ghosh
    [J]. Statistics in Biosciences, 2021, 13 : 34 - 55
  • [2] The challenge of Mendelian randomization approach
    Zoccali, Carmine
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 : 5 - 8
  • [3] Power calculation for the general two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis
    Deng, Lu
    Zhang, Han
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 44 (03) : 290 - 299
  • [4] Interaction analysis in Mendelian randomization
    Knusel, Leona
    Kutalik, Zoltan
    [J]. HUMAN HEREDITY, 2023, 88 (SUPPL 1) : 28 - 28
  • [5] Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis
    Xiaofeng Zhu
    [J]. Quantitative Biology., 2021, 9 (02) - 132
  • [6] Interaction analysis in mendelian randomization
    Knusel, Leona
    Kutalik, Zoltan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 655 - 656
  • [7] Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis
    Zhu, Xiaofeng
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 9 (02) : 122 - 132
  • [8] Editorial: Mendelian Randomization: Approach and Applications
    Wu, Guo-Liang
    Liu, Yao-Zhong
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [9] Overview of Mendelian Randomization Analysis
    Lee, Young Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 27 (04): : 241 - 246
  • [10] Blood Pressure Modification and Life Expectancy in a General Population Mendelian Randomization Analysis
    Daghlas, Iyas
    Gill, Dipender
    [J]. CIRCULATION-GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (06): : 710 - 712