Performance Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi Signals and Proposing a New Method for Mobile Indoor Positioning

被引:7
|
作者
Ilci, Veli [1 ]
Gulal, Engin [2 ]
Alkan, Reha Metin [3 ]
机构
[1] Hitit Univ, Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Corum, Turkey
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Indoor positioning; 2; 4; GHz; 5; Bilateration; Extended Kalman filter; Received signal strength; EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER; LOSS PREDICTION MODELS; LOCALIZATION; SENSORS; SYSTEMS; BILATERATION; INTEGRATION; NAVIGATION; ALGORITHM; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11277-019-06797-x
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the location information of people and objects is a necessity for indoor environments. Therefore, many technologies, methods, and algorithms have been employed in recent years to estimate the positions of people and objects. Although there has been much research into different methods, none of these methods has yet been accepted as a common solution for accurate indoor positioning. Therefore, there is still a lot of work to be done in this area of research. WiFi-based indoor positioning applications are one of the most popular research topics due to not requiring any additional hardware or cost. However, WiFi signals are influenced by many environmental effects, and thus, they show unstable behaviors in indoor environments. Because of the fluctuation of WiFi signal behavior, WiFi-based systems cannot provide sub-meter level accurate solutions. In this paper, we aimed at two main contributions. First, we analyzed and compared the 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi signal behaviors based on the distance. For this purpose, we conducted an experiment using access points along a 27.83 m corridor with 0.605 m intervals in an indoor environment. This experiment showed that the 5 GHz WiFi signal behaviors are more stable than the 2.4 GHz signals. For this reason, it is expected that 5 GHz WiFi signals enable more accurate distance and position information as compared to the 2.4 GHz signals. Secondly, we performed six real-time kinematic experiments on two different trajectories with two main objectives. The first objective was to compare the positioning performances of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi signals. As expected from the first experiment results, positioning accuracies obtained from 5 GHz signals are significantly better than 2.4 GHz signals. In the second objective, we proposed a new algorithm that mainly consists of a fusion of the Bilateration and extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithms. The main purpose of this algorithm is to diminish the effects of faulty received signal strength values on positioning, and therefore, improve the positioning accuracy of the mobile devices. It concluded that the proposed algorithm dramatically improves the positioning accuracy as compared to the Bilateration and EKF algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1511
页数:19
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Performance Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi Signals and Proposing a New Method for Mobile Indoor Positioning
    Veli İlçi
    Engin Gülal
    Reha Metin Alkan
    [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2020, 110 : 1493 - 1511
  • [2] Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
    Bullmann, Markus
    Fetzer, Toni
    Ebner, Frank
    Ebner, Markus
    Deinzer, Frank
    Grzegorzek, Marcin
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (16) : 1 - 26
  • [3] Alleviating Airport WiFi Congestion: A Comparison of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz WiFi Usage and Capabilities
    Hays, Zachary
    Richter, Grant
    Berger, Stephen
    Baylis, Charles
    Marks, Robert J., II
    [J]. 2014 TEXAS SYMPOSIUM ON WIRELESS AND MICROWAVE CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (WMCS), 2014,
  • [4] Performance Comparison of WiFi and UWB Fingerprinting Indoor Positioning Systems
    Caso, Giuseppe
    Le, Mai T. P.
    De Nardis, Luca
    Di Benedetto, Maria-Gabriella
    [J]. TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [5] A Comparison of Received Signal Strength Statistics between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands for WLAN-based Indoor Positioning
    Talvitie, Jukka
    Renfors, Markku
    Lohan, Elena Simona
    [J]. 2015 IEEE GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2015,
  • [6] Experimental Accuracy Comparison for 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi Sensing Systems
    Guan, Haobin
    Sharma, Aryan
    Mishra, Deepak
    Seneviratne, Aruna
    [J]. ICC 2023-IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, : 4755 - 4760
  • [7] Multipath-Assisted Angle of Arrival Indoor Positioning System in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Band
    Wielandt, Stijn
    Goemaere, Jean-Pierre
    De Strycker, Lieven
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDOOR POSITIONING AND INDOOR NAVIGATION (IPIN), 2016,
  • [8] Comparison of Indoor Positioning Methods Based on AR Visual and WiFi Fingerprinting Method
    He, Yijun
    Li, Xiang
    [J]. WEB AND WIRELESS GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 13238 : 141 - 151
  • [9] Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WLAN Network for Purpose of Indoor and Outdoor Location
    Chruszczyk, Lukasz
    Zajac, Adam
    Grzechca, Damian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 62 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [10] Comparing the Performance of Wi-Fi Fingerprinting using the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Signals
    Duong, Doan
    Xu, Yaqian
    David, Klaus
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 87TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2018,