Who should determine energy efficiency level in a green cost-sharing supply chain with learning effect?

被引:30
|
作者
Zhang, Qiao [1 ]
Tang, Wansheng [1 ]
Zhang, Jianxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
关键词
Green supply chain; Differential games; Cost learning; Energy efficiency level; Decision right; CONSUMER ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS; PRICE-COMPETITION; CHANNEL STRUCTURE; ASSEMBLY PLANT; RETAILER; CONTRACT; POLICIES; CHINA; COORDINATION; MANUFACTURER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.014
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasing environmental awareness and green demands drive channel members to jointly take efforts to improve energy efficiency level of products. Considering the cost learning effect, this work develops a differential game model where the retailer (leader) sets retail margin, the manufacturer (follower) determines wholesale price and they jointly invest in energy efficiency level. Two scenarios are considered, where the decision right of energy efficiency level is respectively held by manufacturer (ME) and retailer (RE). Main results indicate that the energy efficiency level is usually governed by the manufacturer rather than the retailer, unless the retailer has a large bargaining power. Besides, the retailer's preference on the decision right is weakened by a larger cost learning effect or energy efficiency effectiveness, but improved by a greater investment cost. This work contributes to researches of the channel members' preference on holding the decision right of energy efficiency level in the presence of cost learning effect, and provides important managerial insights on firms' investment and pricing strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 239
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Green Supply Chain with Sales Effort under a Cost-Sharing Contract
    Shen, Jiayu
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [2] Cost-sharing Contract for a Two Stage Restaurant Green Supply Chain
    Li Xiaoying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH (2018) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT (FRCFM), 2018, : 116 - 119
  • [3] Cartelization or Cost-sharing? Comparison of cooperation modes in a green supply chain
    Dai, Rui
    Zhang, Jianxiong
    Tang, Wansheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 : 159 - 173
  • [4] Cost-sharing models for green product production and marketing in a food supply chain
    Zhu, Qinghua
    Li, Xiaoying
    Zhao, Senlin
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2018, 118 (04) : 654 - 682
  • [5] Research on public cost-sharing of supply chain based on information sharing
    Yixiang, Z.
    INFORMATION SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2014, 46 : 2897 - 2903
  • [6] Optimal decisions and Pareto improvement for green supply chain considering reciprocity and cost-sharing contract
    Man Yang
    Xiao-min Gong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 29859 - 29874
  • [7] Optimal decisions and Pareto improvement for green supply chain considering reciprocity and cost-sharing contract
    Yang, Man
    Gong, Xiao-min
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (23) : 29859 - 29874
  • [8] Research on the coordination of a marine green fuel supply chain considering a cost-sharing contract and a revenue-sharing contract
    Xu, Chang-yan
    Wang, Yi-qun
    Yao, Di-lin
    Qiu, Si-yuan
    Li, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2025, 12
  • [9] Pricing rules of Green Supply Chain considering Big Data information inputs and cost-sharing model
    Liu, Pan
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (13) : 8515 - 8531
  • [10] Pricing rules of Green Supply Chain considering Big Data information inputs and cost-sharing model
    Pan Liu
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 8515 - 8531