Reasoning About Threats: From Observables to Situation Assessment

被引:10
|
作者
Burghouts, Gertjan J. [1 ]
Marck, Jan-Willem [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO Observat Syst, NL-2597 AK The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Architecture; evaluation framework; information processing; observables; situation understanding; threat recognition;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2135344
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We propose a mechanism to assess threats that are based on observables. Observables are properties of persons, i.e., their behavior and interaction with other persons and objects. We consider observables that can be extracted from sensor signals and intelligence. In this paper, we discuss situation assessment that is based on observables for threat assessment. In the experiments, the assessment is evaluated for scenarios that are relevant to antiterrorism and crowd control. The experiments are performed within an evaluation framework, where the setup is such that conclusions can be drawn concerning: 1) the accuracy and robustness of an architecture to assess situations with respect to threats; and 2) the architecture's dependence of the underlying observables in terms of their false positive and negative rates. One of the interesting conclusions is that discriminative assessment of threatening situations can be achieved by combining generic observables. Situations can be assessed with a precision of 90% at a false positive and negative rate of 15% using only eight learning examples. In a real-world experiment at a large train station, we have classified various types of crowd dynamics. Using simple video features of shape and motion, we have proposed a scheme to translate such features into observables that can be classified by a conditional random field (CRF). The implemented CRF shows to classify successfully the crowd dynamics up to 80% accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 616
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reasoning about situation similarity
    Anagnostopoulos, Christos B.
    Ntarladimas, Yiorgos
    Hadjiefthymiades, Stathes
    [J]. 2006 3RD INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 105 - 110
  • [2] REASONING ABOUT TIME IN THE SITUATION CALCULUS
    PINTO, J
    REITER, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 14 (2-4) : 251 - 268
  • [3] Hypothetical reasoning about actions: From situation calculus to event calculus
    Provetti, A
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 12 (03) : 478 - 498
  • [4] Threats to hope: Effects on reasoning about product information
    De Mello, Gustavo
    Macinnis, Deborah J.
    Stewart, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (02) : 153 - 161
  • [5] Representing and Reasoning about Program in Situation Calculus
    Yang Bo
    Zhang Ming-yi
    Wu Mao-nian
    Xie Gang
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION (ICMV 2011): COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS: PATTERN RECOGNITION AND BASIC TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 8350
  • [6] Reasoning about noisy sensors and effecters in the situation calculus
    Bacchus, F
    Halpern, JY
    Levesque, HJ
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 111 (1-2) : 171 - 208
  • [7] Reasoning about noisy sensors and effectors in the situation calculus
    Bacchus, Fahlem
    Halpern, Joseph Y.
    Levesque, Hector J.
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1999, 111 (01): : 171 - 208
  • [8] An approximate reasoning model for situation and threat assessment
    Liang, Yawei
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 246 - 250
  • [9] CONSTRUCTIVE STOCHASTIC TEMPORAL REASONING IN SITUATION ASSESSMENT
    KIRILLOV, VP
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1994, 24 (08): : 1099 - 1113
  • [10] Reasoning about Imperfect Information Games in the Epistemic Situation Calculus
    Belle, Vaishak
    Lakemeyer, Gerhard
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-10), 2010, : 255 - 260