Leader or Party? Personalization in Twitter Political Campaigns during the 2019 Indian Elections

被引:6
|
作者
Rajadesingan, Ashwin [1 ,2 ]
Panda, Anmol [2 ]
Pal, Joyojeet [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Microsoft Res, Bengaluru, India
关键词
SOCIAL MEDIA; MODI; COMMUNICATION; FACEBOOK; VOTE;
D O I
10.1145/3400806.3400827
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Personality-centric politics has been a significant part of discussions on social media's impact on electoral politics. In this study, we quantified personalization in mainstream politics by studying the extent to which parliamentary candidates referred to the key leader of their party as opposed to the party itself in their Twitter political campaigns. We found that the candidates of the incumbent right-wing Hindu nationalist party, the BJP, led by a popular and widely approved leader, Narendra Modi, were significantly more likely to run a leader-centric campaign than the candidates of the main opposition party, the INC. Smaller, state and regionalist parties showed mixed results - while candidates of some parties centralized their discourse significantly in their key leaders, in other parties' campaigns, the party was more prominent than its leader in candidate campaigns. We also found that BJP candidates, rather than uniformly running campaigns coat tailing on their hugely popular leader, were strategic in the extent to which they ran Modi centric campaigns. For BJP candidates, their followers count, the type of constituency and Modi's own approval rating in the region were closely associated with running Moth-centric campaigns. We found no discernible patterns in how INC candidates personalized their social media campaigns.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The face of the party? Leader personalization in British campaigns
    Milazzo, Caitlin
    Hammond, Jesse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2018, 28 (03): : 263 - 282
  • [2] Media Personalization during European Elections: the 2019 Election Campaigns in Context*
    Gattermann, Katjana
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2020, 58 : 91 - 104
  • [3] Topical Focus of Political Campaigns and its Impact: Findings from Politicians' Hashtag Use during the 2019 Indian Elections
    Panda, Anmol
    Mothilal, Ramaravind Kommiya
    Choudhury, Monojit
    Bali, Kalika
    Pal, Joyojeet
    [J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 4 (CSCW1)
  • [4] The Use of Twitter during the 2014 Indian General Elections Framing, Agenda-Setting, and the Personalization of Politics
    Bajaj, Shelly Ghai
    [J]. ASIAN SURVEY, 2017, 57 (02) : 249 - 270
  • [5] Leader or party? Quantifying and exploring behavioral personalization 1996-2019
    Quinlan, Stephen
    McAllister, Ian
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2022, 28 (01) : 24 - 37
  • [6] European Parliament Elections in 2019: Political Party Panorama
    Shweitzer, V
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, 2019, (01): : 38 - 47
  • [7] Political Triangulation: Measuring and Reporting the Key Aspects of Party and Leader Standing Before and During Elections
    Worcester, Robert M.
    Mortimore, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL MARKETING, 2005, 4 (2-3) : 45 - 72
  • [8] Political conversations on Twitter in a disruptive scenario: The role of "party evangelists" during the 2015 Spanish general elections
    Baviera, Tomas
    Sampietro, Agnese
    Garcia-Ull, Francisco J.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2019, 22 (02): : 117 - 138
  • [9] Modeling Indian General Elections: Sentiment Analysis of Political Twitter Data
    Singhal, Kartik
    Agrawal, Basant
    Mittal, Namita
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2015, 339 : 469 - 477
  • [10] The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties
    Ahmed, Saifuddin
    Jaidka, Kokil
    Cho, Jaeho
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2016, 33 (04) : 1071 - 1087