Germany's Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation

被引:1
|
作者
Hennenberg, Klaus Josef [1 ]
Gebhardt, Swantje [1 ]
Wimmer, Florian [2 ]
Distelkamp, Martin [3 ]
Lutz, Christian [3 ]
Boettcher, Hannes [1 ]
Schaldach, Ruediger [2 ]
机构
[1] Oko Inst eV, Rheinstr 95, D-64295 Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Ctr Environm Syst Res, Wilhelmshoher Allee 47, D-34109 Kassel, Germany
[3] Inst Econ Struct Res GWS, Heinrichstr 30, D-49080 Osnabruck, Germany
关键词
bioeconomy; footprint analysis; land use modelling; multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model; land conversion; biodiversity; ecosystem functions; BIODIVERSITY; BIOECONOMY;
D O I
10.3390/su14010105
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country's bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact impact of Natura 2000 designation on agricultural land rents in Germany
    Koemle, Dieter
    Lakner, Sebastian
    Yu, Xiaohua
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 87
  • [2] Driving forces of the agricultural land footprint of China's food supply
    Zhang, Xiaoying
    Fang, Qunchao
    Dai, Guichao
    Wang, Jingmeng
    Ittersum, Martin K. van
    Wang, Hongliang
    Hou, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 449
  • [3] THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INDIA'S EXPORT AND IMPORT OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
    Prasad, Rohini
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, : 154 - 159
  • [4] ALLOCATION OF PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND
    GIBSON, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1977, 32 (06): : 271 - 275
  • [5] Agricultural water and land resources allocation considering carbon sink/ source and water scarcity/degradation footprint
    Wu, Hui
    Guo, Shanshan
    Guo, Ping
    Shan, Baoying
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 819
  • [6] Changing impact of import and export on agricultural land use: The case of Finland 1961-2007
    Sandstrom, Vilma
    Saikku, Laura
    Antikainen, Riina
    Sokka, Laura
    Kauppi, Pekka
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 188 : 163 - 168
  • [7] Germany's food import requirements
    May, RE
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1919, 45 : 337 - 339
  • [8] Land Use Conflicts and Synergies on Agricultural Land in Brandenburg, Germany
    Unger, Martin
    Lakes, Tobia
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [9] The impact of BRICS trade facilitation on China's import and export trade in agricultural products
    Xin, Gao
    Khan, Humayun
    Ling, Xin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [10] China's import demand for agricultural products: The impact of the Phase One trade agreement
    Feenstra, Robert
    Hong, Chang
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 30 (01) : 345 - 368