In 1943, Maurice Blanchot published an article "Kierkegaard and the aesthetic". This article indeed changed Soren Kierkegaard's ethnical status in the philosophy. In this article, Blanchot pointed out a paradox between an aesthetician and ethicist. One has to break rules for the creation, which means it can lie and create the fiction in his work. One the other hand, another one obliges to be honest and follow the ethical rules to discuss the reality questions. Kierkegaard, an author who discusses the ethical problem through his literary writing (aka his novels) cannot perform both roles. Nevertheless, when he chose to speak ethnical within a literary tone (means one used an indirect expression or applied a lot of literary rhetoric to address his/her work), he cannot be an ethicist because an ethicist requires loyal and responsible to the truth. However, a novel writer can be a mystery to holds the attraction for the audience. But if Kierkegaard is an aesthetician rather than an ethicist, how can he convince his reader to believe in god without the dialectical ethics? This article is suggesting through Kierkegaard's literary expression, one will find that he might actually reconstructed a possible passage between the aesthetic and belief in God (theology).
