Measuring ecological impact of water consumption by bioethanol using life cycle impact assessment

被引:14
|
作者
Chiu, Yi-Wen [2 ]
Suh, Sangwon [1 ]
Pfister, Stephan [3 ]
Hellweg, Stefanie [3 ]
Koehler, Annette [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
关键词
Biofuel; Ethanol; Water use impact; Water consumption; Watershed; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FOOTPRINT; BIOFUELS; ETHANOL; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-011-0328-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Though the development of biofuel has attracted numerous studies for quantifying potential water demand applying life cycle thinking, the impacts of biofuel water consumption still remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to quantify ecological impact associated with corn-based bioethanol water consumption in Minnesota in responding to different refinery expansion scenarios by applying a life cycle impact assessment method. This ecological damage assessment method for quantifying water consumption impacts was proposed by Pfister et al. in 2009 (Environ Sci Technol 43: 4098-4104, 2009) using an impact characterization factor integrating terrestrial net primary production and precipitation. In this study, we derived the spatially explicit eco-damage characterization factors for 81 watersheds in Minnesota and compiled location-specific water consumption data for all current and planned bioethanol production facilities and feedstock production. The ecological damage caused by bioethanol production (Delta EQ(EtOH) in m(2)a <...yr) was then calculated on both watershed and refinery-plant levels. Additional refinery expansion scenarios were established for testing the effectiveness in changing Delta EQ(EtOH). The results show that ecological impact Delta EQ(EtOH) varied by more than a factor of 3 between watersheds. Minnesota consumed 40 billion liters of water to produce 2.3 billion liters of ethanol as of 2007 (17 L water per liter of ethanol). The geographical distribution of Delta EQ(EtOH) was shown to be uneven with a cluster of high-impact regions around the center of the state. The planned refinery expansion is expected to increase the state's corn ethanol production capacity by 75% and Delta EQ(EtOH) by 65%. However, strategically locating the planned expansion in the low-impact areas is expected to minimize the increases in Delta EQ(EtOH) down to 19% from 65%. The scenario analysis shows that strategically sourcing corn from low-impact regions can result in significantly less water use impact compared to a baseline scenario. The results indicate that employing the water consumption impact assessment can provide additional insights in policy making. The environmental impacts related to the change of plant infrastructure and agricultural practices associated with the development of the renewable energy industry should be considered as well for identifying the most sustainable alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring ecological impact of water consumption by bioethanol using life cycle impact assessment
    Yi-Wen Chiu
    Sangwon Suh
    Stephan Pfister
    Stefanie Hellweg
    Annette Koehler
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 16 - 24
  • [2] Water Consumption and Environmental Impact of Multifamily Residential Buildings: A Life Cycle Assessment Study
    Mannan, Mehzabeen
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [3] Recycling of Battery Technologies - Ecological Impact Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Unterreiner, Lea
    Juelch, Verena
    Reith, Soeren
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY STORAGE CONFERENCE, IRES 2016, 2016, 99 : 229 - 234
  • [4] Developing Ecological Life Cycle Impact Assessment Characterization Factors for CdTe
    Sinha, Parikhit
    Kounina, Anna
    Spielmann, Michael
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION (WCPEC) (A JOINT CONFERENCE OF 45TH IEEE PVSC, 28TH PVSEC & 34TH EU PVSEC), 2018, : 2606 - 2609
  • [5] Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Saur K.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1997, 2 (2) : 66 - 70
  • [6] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WINE: FOCUS ON WATER USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    Comandaru, Iulia Maria
    Barjoveanu, George
    Peiu, Nicolae
    Ene, Simona-Andreea
    Teodosiu, Carmen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 11 (03): : 533 - 543
  • [7] Water Security and Life Cycle Assessment-Impact of Water Recycling
    Ingram, Dewayne
    Hall, Charles R.
    Knight, Joshua
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2018, 53 (09) : S111 - S112
  • [8] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a solar water heater
    Koroneos, Christopher J.
    Nanaki, Evanthia A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 37 : 154 - 161
  • [9] Environmental impact assessment of green roofs using life cycle assessment
    Rasul, M. G.
    Arutla, L. K. R.
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 503 - 508
  • [10] Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment indicators measuring resource use
    Markus Berger
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 74 - 81