共 50 条
Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and multidisciplinary approach in the management of abdominal or mediastinal mass
被引:10
|作者:
Blanco, Giovanna Del Vecchio
[1
]
Coppola, Manuela
[1
]
Mannisi, Elena
[1
]
Bevivino, Gerolamo
[1
]
Formica, Vincenzo
[2
]
Portarena, Ilaria
[2
]
Romeo, Samanta
[1
]
Sileri, Pierpaolo
[3
]
Roselli, Mario
[2
]
Pallone, Francesco
[1
]
Paoluzi, Omero Alessandro
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Syst Med, Gastroenterol Unit, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Syst Med, Med Oncol Unit, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Surg, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词:
echoendoscope;
fine-needle aspiration;
mediastinum;
pancreas;
ultrasound endoscopy;
SOLID PANCREATIC MASSES;
GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MALIGNANCIES;
GASTROENTEROLOGY EUROPEAN-SOCIETY;
EUS-FNA;
DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY;
CLINICAL IMPACT;
INTRAABDOMINAL LYMPHADENOPATHY;
UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY;
BIOPSY;
LESIONS;
D O I:
10.1097/MEG.0000000000000390
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a useful tool for the diagnosis of suspected abdominal or mediastinal neoplastic lesions.AimTo evaluate the impact of EUS-FNA and multidisciplinary approach on the diagnostic work-up and therapeutic management of patients with abdominal or mediastinal neoplastic lesions.Patients and methodsOne hundred and twenty patients (69 men, median age 65 years) with a suspected abdominal or mediastinal neoplastic mass at computed tomography or MRI underwent EUS-FNA. All EUS-FNA findings and clinical data were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (oncologists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists). EUS-FNA findings were compared with the final diagnosis made by histological evaluation of the surgical specimen or clinical outcome at follow-up.ResultsA correct diagnosis was obtained by EUS-FNA in 96/120 patients (80%), indicating benignancy of the lesion in 21 (18%) cases and confirming malignancy in 75 (62%). On the basis of EUS-FNA findings, chemotherapy was tailored in 57/75 (76%) patients with malignancy whereas the surgical strategy was changed in 21/120 (18%) of patients. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 85%. A multidisciplinary team approach enabled a correct diagnosis in patients in whom EUS-FNA was nondiagnostic and to identify five cases with false-negative EUS-FNA findings.ConclusionEUS-FNA has a relevant impact on the management of suspected abdominal or mediastinal neoplastic lesions. A multidisciplinary team approach enables to overcome the EUS-FNA methodological limitations. The combination of EUS-FNA and multidisciplinary team approach could help to diagnose and tailor therapeutic options in such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1051
页数:7
相关论文