Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability

被引:26
|
作者
Veldre, Aaron [1 ]
Andrews, Sally [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Eye movements; Parafoveal preview benefit; Plausibility; Predictability; Reading; EYE-MOVEMENTS; CONTEXTUAL CONSTRAINT; FIXATION DURATIONS; WORD-LENGTH; BENEFIT; INFORMATION; MODEL; N+2;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2016.1247894
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent studies using the boundary paradigm have shown that readers benefit from a parafoveal preview of a plausible continuation of the sentence. This plausibility preview effect occurs irrespective of the semantic or orthographic relatedness of the preview and target word, suggesting that it depends on the degree to which a preview word fits the preceding context. The present study tested this hypothesis by examining the impact of contextual constraint on processing a plausible word in the parafovea. Participants' eye movements were recorded as they read sentences in which a target word was either highly predictable or unpredictable. The boundary paradigm was used to compare predictable, unpredictable, and implausible previews. The results showed that target predictability significantly modulated the effects of identical and plausible previews. Identical previews yielded significantly more benefit than plausible previews for highly predictable targets, but for unpredictable targets a plausible preview was as beneficial as an identical preview. The results shed light on the role of contextual predictability in early lexical processing. Furthermore, these data support the view that readers activate a set of appropriate words from the preceding sentence context, prior to the presentation of the target word.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 74
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictability effects during reading in the absence of parafoveal preview
    Parker, Adam J.
    Kirkby, Julie A.
    Slattery, Timothy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 29 (08) : 902 - 911
  • [2] Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness
    Aaron Veldre
    Sally Andrews
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24 : 519 - 528
  • [3] Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness
    Veldre, Aaron
    Andrews, Sally
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (02) : 519 - 528
  • [4] Predictability and Parafoveal Preview Effects in the Developing Reader: Evidence From Eye Movements
    Johnson, Rebecca L.
    Oehrlein, Elizabeth C.
    Roche, William L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (07) : 973 - 991
  • [5] Word predictability depends on parafoveal preview validity in Chinese reading
    Chang, Min
    Zhang, Kuo
    Hao, Lisha
    Zhao, Sainan
    McGowan, Victoria A.
    Warrington, Kayleigh L.
    Paterson, Kevin B.
    Wang, Jingxin
    Gunn, Sarah C.
    [J]. VISUAL COGNITION, 2020, 28 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [6] Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese
    Yang, Jinmian
    Li, Nan
    Wang, Suiping
    Slattery, Timothy J.
    Rayner, Keith
    [J]. VISUAL COGNITION, 2014, 22 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [7] Parafoveal Preview Effects in Reading Unspaced Text
    Drieghe, Denis
    Fitzsimmons, Gemma
    Liversedge, Simon P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 43 (10) : 1701 - 1716
  • [8] Parafoveal Preview During Reading: Effects of Sentence Position
    White, Sarah J.
    Warren, Tessa
    Reichle, Erik D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (04) : 1221 - 1238
  • [9] Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading
    Luke, Steven G.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2018, 80 (07) : 1675 - 1682
  • [10] Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading
    Steven G. Luke
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2018, 80 : 1675 - 1682