Who is engaging with lateral flow testing for COVID-19 in the UK? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses (CORSAIR) study

被引:15
|
作者
Smith, Louise E. [1 ,2 ]
Potts, Henry Ww [3 ]
Amlot, Richard [2 ,4 ]
Fear, Nicola T. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Michie, Susan [7 ]
Rubin, G. James [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[2] NIHR Hlth Protect Res Unit Emergency Preparedness, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Hlth Informat, London, England
[4] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Salisbury, Wilts, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Kings Ctr Mil Hlth Res, London, England
[6] Kings Coll London, Acad Dept Mil Mental Hlth, London, England
[7] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
COVID-19; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate uptake of lateral flow testing, reporting of test results and psychological, contextual and socio-demographic factors associated with testing. Design A series of four fortnightly online cross-sectional surveys. Setting Data collected from 19 April 2021 to 2 June 2021. Participants People living in England and Scotland, aged 18 years or over, excluding those who reported their most recent test was a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test (n=6646, n approximate to 1600 per survey). Main outcome measures Having completed at least one lateral flow test (LFT) in the last 7 days. Results We used binary logistic regressions to investigate factors associated with having taken at least one LFT. Increased uptake of testing was associated with being vaccinated (adjusted ORs (aORs)=1.52-2.45, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.07, analysed separately by vaccine dose), employed (aOR=1.94, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.32), having been out to work in the last week (aOR=2.30, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.73) and working in a sector that adopted LFT early (aOR=2.54, 95% CI 2.14 to 3.02) . Uptake was higher in people who reported cardinal COVID-19 symptoms in the last week (aOR=1.89, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.66). People who had heard more about LFTs (aOR=2.28, 95% CI 2.06 to 2.51) and knew they were eligible to receive regular LFTs (aOR=2.98, 95% CI 2.35 to 3.78) were also more likely to have tested. Factors associated with not taking a test included agreeing that you do not need to test for COVID-19 unless you have come into contact with a case (aOR=0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.55). Conclusions Uptake of lateral flow testing is low. Encouraging testing through workplaces and places of study is likely to increase uptake, although care should be taken not to pressurise employees and students. Increasing knowledge that everyone is eligible for regular asymptomatic testing and addressing common misconceptions may drive uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Who is engaging with lateral flow testing for COVID-19 in The UK? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses (CORSAIR) study (vol 12, e058060, 2022)
    Smith, Louise E.
    Potts, Henry W. W.
    Amlot, Richard
    Fear, Nicola T.
    Michie, Susan
    Rubin, G. James
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [2] Worry and behaviour at the start of the COVID-19 outbreak: Results from three UK surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of Adherence to Interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study)
    Smith, Louise E.
    Potts, Henry W. W.
    Amlot, Richard
    Fear, Nicola T.
    Michie, Susan
    Rubin, G. James
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 25
  • [3] Correction: Engagement with protective behaviours in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a series of cross-sectional surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of adherence to interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study)
    Louise E. Smith
    Henry W. W. Potts
    Richard Amlȏt
    Nicola T. Fear
    Susan Michie
    G. James Rubin
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 22
  • [4] Engagement with protective behaviours in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a series of cross-sectional surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of adherence to interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study) (vol 22, 475, 2022)
    Smith, Louise E.
    Potts, Henry W. W.
    Amlot, Richard
    Fear, Nicola T.
    Michie, Susan
    Rubin, G. James
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Intention to adhere to test, trace, and isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study)
    Smith, Louise E.
    Potts, Henry W. W.
    Amlot, Richard
    Fear, Nicola T.
    Michie, Susan
    Rubin, G. James
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) : 1100 - 1118
  • [7] COVID-19 and ventilation in the home; investigating peoples' perceptions and self-reported behaviour (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses [CORSAIR] study) (Vol 15, pg 1, 2021)
    Smith, L. E.
    Potts, H. W. W.
    Amlot, R.
    Fear, N. T.
    Michie, S.
    Rubin, G. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS, 2022, 16
  • [8] Rapid antigen testing in COVID-19 responses
    Garcia-Finana, Marta
    Buchan, Iain E.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6542) : 571 - 572
  • [9] COVID-19 testing in the UK
    不详
    [J]. LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (11): : 1061 - 1061
  • [10] Exploration of the uptake of asymptomatic COVID-19 lateral flow testing in Birmingham, UK: survey and qualitative research
    Mathers, Jonathan
    Poyner, Christopher
    Thompson, Dean
    Rudge, Gavin
    Pritchett, Ruth, V
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):