Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus as Second-line Therapy for Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

被引:74
|
作者
Efe, Cumali [1 ]
Hagstrom, Hannes [2 ]
Ytting, Henriette [3 ]
Bhanji, Rahima A. [4 ,5 ]
Muller, Niklas F. [6 ]
Wang, Qixia [7 ]
Purnak, Tugrul [1 ]
Muratori, Luigi [8 ]
Werner, Marten [9 ]
Marschall, Hanns-Ulrich [10 ]
Muratori, Paolo [8 ]
Gunsar, Fulya [11 ]
Klintman, Daniel [12 ,13 ]
Pares, Albert [14 ]
Heurgue-Berlot, Alexandra [15 ]
Schiano, Thomas D. [16 ]
Cengiz, Mustafa [17 ]
Tana, Michele May-Sien [18 ]
Ma, Xiong [7 ]
Montano-Loza, Aldo J. [4 ,5 ]
Berg, Thomas [6 ]
Verma, Sumita [19 ]
Larsen, Fin Stolze [3 ]
Ozaslan, Ersan [20 ]
Heneghan, Michael A. [21 ]
Yoshida, Eric M. [13 ]
Wahlin, Staffan [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Hepatol Div, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Hepatol, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Gastroenterol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Liver Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, Sekt Hepatol, Klin Gastroenterol & Rheumatol, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Renji Hosp, Sch Med,Shanghai Canc Inst,Shanghai Inst Digest D, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Bologna, Ctr Studio & Cura Malattie Autoimmuni Fegato & Vi, Dipartimento Sci Med & Chirurg, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[9] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Umea, Sweden
[10] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Mol & Clin Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[11] Ege Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Izmir, Turkey
[12] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Mol & Clin Med, Lund, Sweden
[13] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[14] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Liver Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[15] CHU Reims, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Reims, France
[16] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Div Liver Dis, New York, NY 10029 USA
[17] Dr AY Oncol Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[18] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Liver, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[19] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[20] Numune Res & Educ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[21] Kings Coll Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Inst Liver Studies, London, England
关键词
Autoimmune Liver Disease; Simplified Criteria; Liver Failure; Liver Transplantation; OVERLAP SYNDROMES; STANDARD THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; INTOLERANT; REMISSION; DIFFICULT; FIBROSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.001
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Predniso(lo) ne, alone or in combination with azathioprine, is the standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, the SOC therapy is poorly tolerated or does not control disease activity in up to 20% of patients. We assessed the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with AIH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of data (from 19 centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and China) from 201 patients with AIH who received second-line therapy (121 received MMF and 80 received tacrolimus), for a median of 62 months (range, 6-190 mo). Patients were categorized according to their response to SOC. Patients in group 1 (n = 108) had a complete response to the SOC, but were switched to second-line therapy as a result of side effects of predniso(lo) ne or azathioprine, whereas patients in group 2 (n = 93) had not responded to SOC. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a complete response to MMF (69.4%) vs tacrolimus (72.5%) (P = .639). In group 1, MMF and tacrolimus maintained a biochemical remission in 91.9% and 94.1% of patients, respectively (P = .682). Significantly more group 2 patients given tacrolimus compared with MMF had a complete response (56.5% vs 34%, respectively; P = .029) There were similar proportions of liver-related deaths or liver transplantation among patients given MMF (13.2%) vs tacrolimus (10.3%) (log-rank, P = .472). Ten patients receiving MMF (8.3%) and 10 patients receiving tacrolimus (12.5%) developed side effects that required therapy withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term therapy with MMF or tacrolimus generally was well tolerated by patients with AIH. The agents were equally effective in previous complete responders who did not tolerate SOC therapy. Tacrolimus led to a complete response in a greater proportion of previous nonresponder patients compared with MMF.
引用
收藏
页码:1950 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Second-Line Therapies for Pediatric Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis
    Efe, Cumali
    Al Taii, Haider
    Ytting, Henriette
    Aehling, Niklas
    Bhanji, Rahima A.
    Hagstrom, Hannes
    Purnak, Tugrul
    Muratori, Luigi
    Werner, Marten
    Muratori, Paolo
    Klintman, Daniel
    Schiano, Thomas D.
    Montano-Loza, Aldo J.
    Berg, Thomas
    Larsen, Fin Stolze
    Alkhouri, Naim
    Ozaslan, Ersan
    Heneghan, Michael A.
    Yoshida, Eric M.
    Wahlin, Staffan
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (05) : 1348 - 1354
  • [2] Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Second-Line Therapies for Pediatric Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis
    Cumali Efe
    Haider Al Taii
    Henriette Ytting
    Niklas Aehling
    Rahima A. Bhanji
    Hannes Hagström
    Tugrul Purnak
    Luigi Muratori
    Mårten Werner
    Paolo Muratori
    Daniel Klintman
    Thomas D. Schiano
    Aldo J. Montano-Loza
    Thomas Berg
    Fin Stolze Larsen
    Naim Alkhouri
    Ersan Ozaslan
    Michael A. Heneghan
    Eric M. Yoshida
    Staffan Wahlin
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2018, 63 : 1348 - 1354
  • [3] Mycophenolate Mofetil as Second Line Therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis?
    Hennes, Elke M.
    Oo, Ye H.
    Schramm, Christoph
    Denzer, Ulrike
    Buggisch, Peter
    Wiegard, Christiane
    Kanzler, Stephan
    Schuchmann, Marcus
    Boecher, Wulf
    Galle, Peter R.
    Adams, David H.
    Lohse, Ansgar W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (12): : 3063 - 3070
  • [4] Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as second-line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis:Is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?
    Mohammadreza Abdollahi
    Neda Khalilian Ekrami
    Morteza Ghojazadeh
    H Marike Boezen
    Mohammadhossein Somi
    Behrooz Z Alizadeh
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, (38) : 5896 - 5910
  • [5] Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as second-line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis: Is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?
    Abdollahi, Mohammadreza
    Ekrami, Neda Khalilian
    Ghojazadeh, Morteza
    Boezen, H. Marike
    Somi, Mohammadhossein
    Alizadeh, Behrooz Z.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (38) : 5896 - 5910
  • [6] MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL AS SECOND-LINE THERAPY FOR AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Santiago, Priscila
    Tamariz, Leonardo
    Schwartz, Ingrid
    Levy, Cynthia
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1098 - S1098
  • [7] Systematic review with meta-analysis: mycophenolate mofetil as a second-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis
    Santiago, Priscila
    Schwartz, Ingrid
    Tamariz, Leonardo
    Levy, Cynthia
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 49 (07) : 830 - 839
  • [8] Second-Line Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis: Mycophenolate Mofetil as an effective Treatment Option?
    Ploch, P.
    Marquardt, J.
    Fritsche, S.
    Krupp, M.
    Galle, P.
    Teufel, A.
    Barreiros, A.
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2013, 54 : 26 - 26
  • [9] Second Line Therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis: is Mycophenolate Mofetil an effective option?
    Ploch, Philippe
    Marquardt, Jens U.
    Fritzsche, Susanne
    Krupp, Markus
    Galle, Peter R.
    Teufel, Andreas
    Barreiros, Ana P.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 : 724A - 724A
  • [10] Tacrolimus as second-line therapy in acute severe autoimmune hepatitis
    Efe, Cumali
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 56 (03) : 298 - 298