An Indirect Paper-and-Pencil Measure of Prejudice: A German Version of the Racial Argument Scale

被引:1
|
作者
Heitland, Kirsten [1 ]
Bohner, Gerd [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Inst Interdisciplinary Res Conflict & Violence, Grad Sch Grp Focused Enm, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Psychol, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
Indirect measurement; Nonreactive measures; Racial argument scale; Scale development; Prejudice; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; RIGHT-WING AUTHORITARIANISM; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; INTERGROUP CONTACT; SUBTLE PREJUDICE; GROUP THREAT; DISCRIMINATION; ATTITUDES; PERSONALITY; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-010-9098-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prejudices against minorities are still a cause of inter-ethnic conflict and violence, although their expression has changed from blatant to more subtle forms. There has been a shortage of valid and reliable German-language scales for the measurement of contemporary racial prejudices. The Racial Argument Scale (RAS; Saucier & Miller Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35:433-450, 2003) measures contemporary prejudice indirectly by asking respondents to judge how well given arguments support a conclusion. This scale was adapted to the German context with Turks as the target group. A validation study using a diverse sample of German adults (N = 194) attests to the reliability and construct validity of the German RAS (RAS-G). The adapted instrument is thus suitable for the indirect measurement of prejudice in German-speaking samples.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] An Indirect Paper-and-Pencil Measure of Prejudice: A German Version of the Racial Argument Scale
    Kirsten Heitland
    Gerd Bohner
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2011, 30 : 1 - 21
  • [2] A subtle measure of prejudice: Development and validation of a German version of the Racial Argument Scale
    Heitland, Kirsten
    Bohner, Gerd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 99 - 99
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT OF A PAPER-AND-PENCIL MEASURE OF CONFORMITY
    HEIDELMAIER, LK
    GILROY, FD
    MOLFETTA, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1994, 74 (03) : 786 - 786
  • [4] A paper-and-pencil measure of prefrontal subcortical dysfunction
    Spinella, Marcello
    Lester, David
    Yang, Bijou
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2006, 103 (03) : 676 - 676
  • [5] Construction of a computerized adaptive version of a paper-and-pencil test
    deBeer, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 84153 - 84153
  • [6] Paper-and-pencil version of priming task for attended distractors
    Rosin, FM
    Galera, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 52 - 52
  • [7] Trail Making Test: comparison of paper-and-pencil version with electronic version
    Bracken, M. R.
    Anya, M.
    Ross, M. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 30 (03): : 436 - 437
  • [8] Reliability of a paper-and-pencil version of the Japanese Adult Reading Test short version
    Hirata-Mogi, Sachiko
    Koike, Shinsuke
    Toriyama, Rie
    Matsuoka, Keiko
    Kim, Yoshiharu
    Kasai, Kiyoto
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2016, 70 (08) : 362 - 362
  • [9] Validity of a Paper-and-Pencil Form of the MMPI Psychopathic Deviate Scale
    Machover, Solomon
    Anderson, Helen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1953, 17 (06): : 459 - 461
  • [10] Measurement of perceived pressures in psychiatry: paper-and-pencil and computerized adaptive version of the P-PSY35 scale
    Golay, Philippe
    Martinez, Debora
    Bachelard, Mizue
    Silva, Benedetta
    Brodard, Alexandra
    Perrin, Jonathan
    Fernando, Nolan Pedro
    Renaud, Lou-Ann
    Bonsack, Charles
    Morandi, Stephane
    [J]. ANNALS OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 23 (01)