Predicting patient-specific response to adaptive therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen dynamics

被引:23
|
作者
Brady-Nicholls, Renee [1 ]
Zhang, Jingsong [2 ]
Zhang, Tian [3 ]
Wang, Andrew Z. [4 ]
Butler, Robert [5 ]
Gatenby, Robert A. [6 ]
Enderling, Heiko [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Integrated Math Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Genitourinary Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, 20 Duke Med Cir, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Phys Sci Oncol Ctr, Tampa, FL USA
[6] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
来源
NEOPLASIA | 2021年 / 23卷 / 09期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Metastatic; Mathematical; Modeling; Predictive; Adaptive therapy; Prostate-specific antigen; INTERMITTENT ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL-MODEL; DEPRIVATION; ABIRATERONE; SURVIVAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.neo.2021.06.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Abiraterone acetate (AA) has been proven effective for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and it has been proposed that adaptive AA may reduce toxicity and prolong time to progression, when compared to continuous AA. We developed a simple quantitative model of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics to evaluate prostate cancer (PCa) stem cell enrichment as a plausible driver of AA treatment resistance. The model incorporated PCa stem cells, non-stem PCa cells and PSA dynamics during adaptive therapy. A leave-one-out analysis was used to calibrate and validate the model against longitudinal PSA data from 16 mCRPC patients receiving adaptive AA in a pilot clinical study. Early PSA treatment response dynamics were used to predict patient response to subsequent treatment. We extended the model to incorporate metastatic burden and also investigated the survival benefit of adding concurrent chemotherapy for patients predicted to become resistant. Model simulations demonstrated PCa stem cell self-renewal as a plausible driver of resistance to adaptive therapy. Evolutionary dynamics from individual treatment cycles combined with metastatic burden measurements predicted patient response with 81% accuracy (specificity=92%, sensitivity=50%). In those patients predicted to progress, simulations of the addition of concurrent chemotherapy suggest a benefit between 1% and 11% reduction in probability of progression when compared to adaptive AA alone. This study developed the first mCRPC patient-specific mathematical model to use early PSA treatment response dynamics to predict subsequent responses to adaptive AA, demonstrating the putative value of integrating mathematical modeling into clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Teo, Min Yuen
    Morris, Michael J.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (05): : 347 - 352
  • [2] Prostate-specific antigen response patterns during cabazitaxel therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Kanao, Kent
    Ito, Toshiki
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Ando, Ryosuke
    Yasui, Takahiro
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (11) : 1043 - 1048
  • [3] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Uptake and Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.
    Niaz, Muhammad Junaid
    Sun, Michael
    Mosallaie, Seyed Ali
    Thomas, Charlene
    Christos, Paul J.
    Osborne, Joseph R.
    Molina, Ana M.
    Nanus, David M.
    Bander, Neil H.
    Tagawa, Scott T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [4] Dramatic prostate-specific antigen response with activated hemicellulose compound in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Turner, Jeffrey
    Chaudhary, Uzair
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2009, 20 (03) : 215 - 216
  • [5] Prostate-specific antigen response with enzalutamide in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: PROSPER
    von Bueren, Moritz
    Sternberg, N.
    Fizazi, Karim
    Saad, Fred
    Rathenborg, Per
    Shore, Neal D.
    Demirhan, Eren
    Modelska, Katharina
    De Phung
    Krivoshik, Andrew
    Hussain, Maha
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, 149 : 16S - 17S
  • [6] Understanding prostate-specific antigen dynamics in monitoring metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: implications for clinical practice
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Konaka, Hiroyuki
    Kitagawa, Yasuhide
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Narimoto, Kazutaka
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Bahl, Amit K.
    Namiki, Mikio
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2017, 19 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [7] Prostate-Specific Antigen Flare Induced by (223)Ra therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Castello, A.
    Macapinlac, H. A.
    Santos, E. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S211 - S211
  • [8] Narrative review: prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Lunger, Lukas
    Tauber, Robert
    Feuerecker, Benedikt
    Gschwend, Jurgen E.
    Eiber, Matthias
    Heck, Matthias M.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (10) : 3963 - 3971
  • [9] Modeling the Relationship Between Exposure to Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen Dynamics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Xu, Xu Steven
    Ryan, Charles J.
    Stuyckens, Kim
    Smith, Matthew R.
    Saad, Fred
    Griffin, Thomas W.
    Park, Youn C.
    Yu, Margaret K.
    De Porre, Peter
    Vermeulen, An
    Poggesi, Italo
    Nandy, Partha
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2017, 56 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [10] Modeling the Relationship Between Exposure to Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen Dynamics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Xu Steven Xu
    Charles J. Ryan
    Kim Stuyckens
    Matthew R. Smith
    Fred Saad
    Thomas W. Griffin
    Youn C. Park
    Margaret K. Yu
    Peter De Porre
    An Vermeulen
    Italo Poggesi
    Partha Nandy
    [J]. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2017, 56 : 55 - 63