Extended orbital exenteration for sinonasal malignancy with orbital apex extension: surgical technique and clinical analysis

被引:17
|
作者
Sugawara, Takashi [1 ]
Aoyagi, Masaru [1 ]
Ogishima, Takahiro [1 ]
Kawano, Yoshihisa [1 ]
Tamaki, Masashi [5 ]
Yano, Tomoyuki [3 ]
Tsunoda, Atsunobu [2 ]
Ohno, Kikuo [1 ]
Maehara, Taketoshi [1 ]
Kishimoto, Seiji [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[4] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Chiba, Japan
[5] Musashino Red Cross Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
craniofacial resection; orbital exenteration; sinonasal malignancies; surgical technique; ANTERIOR CRANIOFACIAL RESECTION; SKULL BASE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.3171/2014.9.JNS141256
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECT The majority of sinonasal malignancies present with advanced disease, and cure rates are generally poor. Surgical extirpation remains the mainstay of treatment. In cases of sinonasal malignancy with orbital apex extension, gross-total tumor resection requires orbital exenteration and bony skull base resection around the orbital apex to provide sufficient margins. In this retrospective study, the authors describe their surgical strategy in and technique for orbital exenteration with orbital apex resection in patients at Tokyo Medical and Dental University who had sinonasal malignancy with orbital apex extension. They also analyzed the clinical features of and the results in these patients. METHODS Between February 2001 and August 2012 at the authors' institution, sinonasal malignancy with orbital apex extension was treated using craniofacial tumor resection with orbital exenteration including skull base bone around the orbital apex. The authors describe this technique and analyze the surgical indications, extent of resection, primary tumor location, outcome, pathological findings, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies of the patients who underwent the technique. RESULTS The patients consisted of 12 men and 3 women with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 14-79 years). The longest postoperative follow-up was 9.5 years, and the shortest was 0.67 year (mean 3.0 years). Tumor originated at the ethmoid sinus in 6 patients (40%), maxillary sinus in 5 (33%), nasal cavity in 2 (13%), and orbital cavity and maxillary bone in 1 patient each (7%). Histological analysis of tumor specimens revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 9 patients (60%), rhabdomyosarcoma in 2 (13%), and small cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and Ewing sarcoma in 1 patient each (7%). Two patients experienced recurrences at 1 and 5 months after treatment; these patients died at 5 and 10 months after surgery, respectively. Estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.7%, and estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 86.2%; there was no perioperative mortality. None of the patients had new neurological deficits as a result of the surgery, but 5 patients suffered infectious complications from the graft transplanted into the cavity after resection. There were no other perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS These authors are the first to describe a technique for extended orbital exenteration with orbital apex skull base resection. The technique provided sufficient margins for gross-total resection of the sinonasal malignancy with orbital apex extension. The estimated 5-year OS and RFS rates were high, and the perioperative complication rate was acceptably low, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sinonasal Malignancy and Orbital Exenteration Sparing Cancer Surgery
    Reyes, Camilo
    Patel, Mihir
    Solares, C. Arturo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2020, 81 (04) : 369 - 375
  • [2] Orbital preservation in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy
    Imola, MJ
    Schramm, VL
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (08): : 1357 - 1365
  • [3] Orbital exenteration: A dilemma in mucormycosis presented with orbital apex syndrome
    Songu, Murat
    Unlu, H. Halis
    Gunhan, Kivanc
    Rker, S. Sarni
    Nese, Nalan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2008, 22 (01): : 98 - 103
  • [4] Ocular Perfusion Following Orbital Apex Exenteration
    Gallo, Ryan A.
    Pirakitikulr, Nathan
    Tse, David T.
    Rong, Andrew J.
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (03): : E85 - E88
  • [5] Transorbital-transsinus resection of sinonasal malignancy with extraconal orbital extension
    Radabaugh, Jeffrey Paul
    Richani-Riverol, Karina
    Luong, Amber U.
    Yao, William C.
    Ho, Tang
    Citardi, Martin J.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) : 128 - 131
  • [6] Exenteration of Malignant Tumors with Orbital Extension
    Yuksel, Dilek
    Ozer, Pinar
    Koklu, Burcin
    Emec, Seda
    Duman, Sunay
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 39 (04): : 288 - 294
  • [7] INDICATIONS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR ORBITAL EXENTERATION
    KENNEDY, RE
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1979, 86 (05) : 967 - 973
  • [8] ORBITAL EXENTERATION WITH SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF MUSCLES
    MARCULESCU, A
    PRALEA, E
    GRIGOROVICI, S
    ANNALES D OCULISTIQUE, 1973, 206 (10): : 772 - 772
  • [9] Orbital exenteration: Surgical and reconstructive strategies
    Mohr, C
    Esser, J
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 235 (05) : 288 - 295
  • [10] Orbital exenteration: Surgical and reconstructive strategies
    Christopher Mohr
    Joachim Esser
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1997, 235 : 288 - 295