Nalbuphine versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

被引:15
|
作者
Amin, Olfat Abdelmoniem Ibrahem [1 ]
Ibrahem, Mohamed Abdel-moniem [2 ]
Salem, Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia & Surg Intens Care Dept, Alsharkia, Egypt
[2] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Alsharkia, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
cesarean section; spinal anesthesia; nalbuphine; midazolam; postoperative analgesia; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S242545
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose: Adding adjuvants to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine provides long analgesic duration with less adverse effects. The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal nalbuphine versus midazolam in patients undergoing cesarean section. Clinical Trial ID: NCT03918187. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study conducted on 90 females undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia who were randomly allocated to three equal groups of 30 patients each: group C received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 0.5 mL saline, group N received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 1 mg nalbuphine, group M received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 2.5 mg midazolam. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, effective analgesic time, analgesic requirements, adverse effects, sedation, and Apgar scores were recorded. Results: There was significant rapid onset of sensory and motor block (1.95 +/-.44 and 3.50 +/- 0.43 min) with slower regression of sensory block and time to bromage I (211.6 +/- 13.2 and 219.8 +/- 20.2 min) in group N compared to groups M, C (p < 0.001), with statistically significant rapid onset and long duration of both blocks in group M compared to C (p<0.001). The effective analgesic time was significantly prolonged in group N (263.7 +/- 16.3) compared to groups M and C (224.2 +/- 18.6, 185.5 +/- 17.45), respectively, (p<0.001) and prolonged in group M compared to C (p<0.001), with increase in analgesic requirement in group C compared to groups N and M (p<0.001) and no significant difference between groups N and M. There was higher sedation score in groups N, M (1.78 +/- 0.63, 2.75 +/- 0.54), respectively, compared to group C (0.61 +/- 0.12) (p<0.001) with lower Apgar score in group M (6.9 +/- 0.73) at one minute than in groups N, C (7.1 +/- 0.91, 7.7 +/- 0.84) (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding the adverse effects. Conclusion: Adding 1 mg nalbuphine to 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine provided more effective postoperative analgesia than adding 2.5 mg midazolam, with less non-significant adverse effects in midazolam group in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1376
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between intrathecal nalbuphine versus fentanyl as an adjuvant with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section
    Jain, Neena
    Sethi, Surendra K.
    Saini, Amrit L.
    Patodi, Veena
    Jain, Kavita
    Thada, Beena
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 12 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [2] Comparative study of intrathecal preservative-free midazolam versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in patients undergoing elective lower-segment caesarean section
    Kapdi, Manisha
    Desai, Shruti
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [3] Comparative study of intrathecal preservative-free midazolam versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in patients undergoing elective lower-segment caesarean section
    Manisha Kapdi
    Shruti Desai
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 13
  • [4] Comparison of clonidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarian section
    Shidhaye, Ramchandra Vinayak
    Shah, Bhavini Bhushan
    Joshi, Smita Suresh
    Deogaonkar, Shrikrishna Govind
    Bhuva, Abhishek P.
    SRI LANKAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 22 (01): : 15 - 20
  • [5] A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after cesarean section
    Gomaa, Hala Mostafa
    Mohamed, Nashwa Nabil
    Zoheir, Heba Allah Hussein
    Ali, Mohamad Saeid
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (04) : 405 - 410
  • [6] Assessment of the Efficacy of Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Endoscopic Urological Surgeries for the Prolongation of Postoperative Analgesia
    Dessai, Saiesh Raut
    Ninave, Sanjot
    Verma, Neeta
    Bele, Amol
    Nayak, Aishwarya
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [7] Comparison of different doses of clonidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarian section
    Bhushan, Shah Bhavini
    Suresh, Joshi Smita
    Vinayak, Shidhaye Ramchandra
    Lakhe, J. N.
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2012, 16 (03) : 266 - 272
  • [8] Comparison of the Effects of Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia
    Samantaray, Aloka
    Hemanth, Natham
    Gunnampati, Karunakar
    Pasupuleti, Hemalatha
    Mukkara, Madhusudan
    Rao, Mangu Hanumantha
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [9] A study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries
    Khare, Arvind
    Chohala, Mukesh
    Thada, Beena
    Mathur, Veena
    Garg, Deepak
    Tanwar, Neha
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [10] A study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries
    Arvind Khare
    Mukesh Chohala
    Beena Thada
    Veena Mathur
    Deepak Garg
    Neha Tanwar
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14