The dangers of conflating technique with ethics: Commentary on Arnold Goldberg's "Some Limits of the Boundary Concept"

被引：0

作者：

Friedman, Henry J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

来源：

PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY | 2008年 / 77卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1002/j.2167-4086.2008.tb00368.x

中图分类号：

B84-0 [心理学理论];

学科分类号：

040201 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：907 / 913

页数：7

共 8 条

[1] Commentary on Arnold Goldberg's "Some Limits of the Boundary Concept"
Zalusky, Sharon
PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, 2008, 77 (03): : 897 - 905
[2] Boundaries and beyond: Commentary on Arnold Goldberg's "Some Limits of the Boundary Concept"
Poland, Warren S.
PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, 2008, 77 (03): : 891 - 896
[3] Boundaries, technique, and self-deception: A discussion of Arnold Goldberg's "Some Limits of the Boundary Concept"
Gabbard, Glen O.
PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, 2008, 77 (03): : 877 - 881
[4] Boundary exegesis: Response to commentaries on "Some Limits of the Boundary Concept"
Goldberg, Arnold
PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, 2008, 77 (03): : 915 - 919
[5] Commentary to B. Williams's French Introduction to Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
Babbiotti, Paolo
Krishnan, Nikhil
Marquier, Mathis
PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES, 2021, 9 (02): : 259 - 268
[6] Technical terms, intervening variables, and the limits of the concept of motivation: A response to whelan and Barnes-Holmes's (2013) commentary
Aló R.M.
Cançado C.R.X.
The Psychological Record, 2013, 63 (3) : 661 - 666
[7] The long and winding road from concept to practice:: The intersubjective shaping of psychoanalytically informed technique in contemporary hypnosis -: A commentary upon and extension of Baker's "Reflections on the Hypnotic Relationship"
Diamond, MJ
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS, 2000, 48 (01) : 70 - 85
[8] An objectivist's view on the ethics of evidence-based medicine:: commentary on 'A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine:: some ethical considerations' (Gupta 2003; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121)
Couto, JS
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 9 (02) : 137 - 139

← 1 →