Efficacy and Safety of a Low-Level Light Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Self-Comparison, Sham Device-Controlled Trial

被引:32
|
作者
Fan, Sabrina Mai-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Yu-Pin [3 ]
Lee, Ming-Yung [4 ]
Lin, Sung-Jan [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Chiu, Hsien-Yi [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Biomed Engn, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Biomed Engn, Coll Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Providence Univ, Stat & Informat Dept, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Dermatol, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Res Ctr Dev Biol & Regenerat Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[9] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Hsin Chu Branch, Dept Dermatol, 25,Lane 442,Sec 1,Jingguo Rd, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
关键词
PATTERN HAIR LOSS; NEON LASER IRRADIATION; HUMAN SCALP HAIR; GROWTH; MULTICENTER; REGROWTH; FEMALES; NO;
D O I
10.1097/DSS.0000000000001577
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported the benefits of low-level/light laser therapy (LLLT) for the promotion of hair regrowth. However, the effectiveness of LLLT for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is still a topic of debate. OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of LLLT on hair regrowth in patients with AGA. METHODS This 24-week, randomized, double-blind, self-comparison, sham device-controlled trial enrolled 100 patients with AGA. All participants were randomly assigned to receive the investigational LLLT on one side of the head and sham light treatment on the contralateral side, 3 times weekly for 30 minutes each, over a 24-week period. Global scalp photography, phototrichogram assessment, the investigator's global assessment (IGA) of hair regrowth, and the subject's assessment of the treatment satisfaction were used for evaluation. RESULTS After 24 weeks of treatment, the LLLT-treated scalp exhibited significantly greater hair coverage than the sham light-treated side (14.2% vs. 11.8%, p<.001). A significantly greater improvement from baseline in hair thickness, hair count, hair coverage, and IGA were also observed in the LLLT-treated side than in the sham light-treated side at the 12- and 24-week visits. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION The use of LLLT might be an effective, safe, well-tolerated treatment for AGA.
引用
收藏
页码:1411 / 1420
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-Level Light Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Device-Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Kim, Hyojin
    Choi, Jee Woong
    Kim, Jun Young
    Shin, Jung Won
    Lee, Seok-jong
    Huh, Chang-Hun
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2013, 39 (08) : 1177 - 1183
  • [2] Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in Thai men and women: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled trial
    Poonkiat Suchonwanit
    Noppanun Chalermroj
    Saranya Khunkhet
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 2019, 34 : 1107 - 1114
  • [3] Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in Thai men and women: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled trial
    Suchonwanit, Poonkiat
    Chalermroj, Noppanun
    Khunkhet, Saranya
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 34 (06) : 1107 - 1114
  • [4] Low-level light therapy using a helmet-type device for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia A 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled trial
    Yoon, Jung Soo
    Ku, Won Young
    Lee, Jang Hyun
    Ahn, Hee Chang
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (29) : E21181
  • [5] HairMax LaserComb® Laser Phototherapy Device in the Treatment of Male Androgenetic Alopecia, A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Device-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
    Leavitt, Matt
    Charles, Glenn
    Heyman, Eugene
    Michaels, David
    [J]. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2009, 29 (05) : 283 - 292
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of a Low-level Laser Device in the Treatment of Male and Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Multicenter, Randomized, Sham Device-controlled, Double-blind Study
    Joaquin J. Jimenez
    Tongyu C. Wikramanayake
    Wilma Bergfeld
    Maria Hordinsky
    Janet G. Hickman
    Michael R. Hamblin
    Lawrence A. Schachner
    [J]. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2014, 15 : 115 - 127
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of a Low-level Laser Device in the Treatment of Male and Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Multicenter, Randomized, Sham Device-controlled, Double-blind Study
    Jimenez, Joaquin J.
    Wikramanayake, Tongyu C.
    Bergfeld, Wilma
    Hordinsky, Maria
    Hickman, Janet G.
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    Schachner, Lawrence A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 15 (02) : 115 - 127
  • [8] HairMax LaserComb® Laser Phototherapy Device in the Treatment of Male Androgenetic AlopeciaA Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Device-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
    Matt Leavitt
    Glenn Charles
    Eugene Heyman
    David Michaels
    [J]. Clinical Drug Investigation, 2009, 29 : 283 - 292
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of a novel herbal solution for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia and comparison with 5% minoxidil: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial study
    Masoud, Farid
    Alamdari, Hamideh Azimi
    Asnaashari, Solmaz
    Shokri, Javad
    Javadzadeh, Yousef
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2020, 33 (06)
  • [10] Photobiomodulation therapy with an 830-nm light-emitting diode for the prevention of thyroidectomy scars: a randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled clinical trial
    Yul Hee Kim
    Hyeung Kyoo Kim
    Jee Woong Choi
    You Chan Kim
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 2022, 37 : 3583 - 3590