Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography: diagnostic performance and effect on recall rates versus digital mammography in category O

被引:0
|
作者
Emlik, Ganime Dilek [1 ]
Poyraz, Necdet [1 ]
Altunkeser, Aysegul [2 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
关键词
Screening mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; ultrasonography; diagnostic performance; recall rates; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic performance and screening recall rates of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound (US) added to digital mammography (DM) in the category O. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained. The additional breast US and DBT performed 216 women categorized as BI-RADS category O according to screening DM between January 2014 and February 2015. A total of 22 women that previously underwent breast surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy were excluded. Finally 194 patients were enrolled in this study. The DM+DBT images and DM+DBT images with US images of patients were independently reviewed by three breast radiologists and than recategorized according to BI-RADS category. Among 194 lesions, 165 (85%) were benign and 29 (14.9%) were malign. DBT reduced recall rate by 70%. For DBT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, 48%, 99%, and 84%, whereas for US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 93%, 79%, 47%, 98%, and 81%, respectively. AUC value was 0.89 and 0.86 for DBT and US. In conclusion, DBT reduced recall rates. DBT showed better diagnostic performance than breast US for category O. Reduction in RR was independent from breast parenchymal patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:10668 / 10675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
    Gisella Gennaro
    Alicia Toledano
    Cosimo di Maggio
    Enrica Baldan
    Elisabetta Bezzon
    Manuela La Grassa
    Luigi Pescarini
    Ilaria Polico
    Alessandro Proietti
    Aida Toffoli
    Pier Carlo Muzzio
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 1545 - 1553
  • [2] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Toledano, Alicia
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    Baldan, Enrica
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    La Grassa, Manuela
    Pescarini, Luigi
    Polico, Ilaria
    Proietti, Alessandro
    Toffoli, Aida
    Muzzio, Pier Carlo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) : 1545 - 1553
  • [3] Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density
    Conant, Emily F.
    Barlow, William E.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    diFlorio-Alexander, Roberta M.
    Li, Christopher I.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Onega, Tracy
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Birdwell, Robyn
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Bronson, Mackenzie
    Chen, Jane
    Goodrich, Martha
    Harris, Kimberly A.
    St Hubert, Stella
    Pearson, Loretta
    Andrews, Steven
    Anton, Kristen
    Batcho, Katrine
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Cook, Charles
    Das, Amar
    Dougher, Ryan
    Eliassen, Scottie
    Farr, Scott
    Felone, Carol
    Frazee, Tracy
    Gerlach, Scott
    Getty, George
    Gilman, John
    Hanson, Dick
    Johnson, Dennis
    Joseph, Brenda
    Laam, Leslie A.
    Levin, Brian
    Pyle, Steven
    Sims-Larabee, Laura
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 635 - 642
  • [4] Breast Cancer Detection: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Mammography versus Digital Mammography
    Ha, Su Min
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)
  • [5] Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cochon, Laila R.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (08) : 999 - 1003
  • [6] Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Full-Field Digital Mammography in Recall Rates and Cancer Detection Rates
    Procasco, Margaret
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 87 (03) : 349 - 351
  • [7] Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Akhtar, Amana L.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (05) : 1143 - 1148
  • [8] Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02): : 362 - 379
  • [9] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience
    Bernstein, Michael H.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [10] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study
    Thibault, Fabienne
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Breucq, Catherine
    Balleyguier, Corinne S.
    Malhaire, Caroline
    Steyaert, Luc
    Tardivon, Anne
    Baldan, Enrica
    Drevon, Harir
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (09) : 2441 - 2449