A comparison of tape-tying versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults

被引:19
|
作者
Murdoch, E.
Holdgate, A.
机构
[1] NRMA Careflight Helicopter Base, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] St George Hosp, Emergency Dept, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
[3] Wollongong Hosp, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
endotracheal tube; endotracheal tube holder;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X0703500512
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
During the transfer of intubated patients, endotracheal tube security is paramount. This study aims to compare two methods of securing an endotracheal tube in adults: tying with a cloth tape versus the Thomas Endotracheal Tube Holder (Laerdal). A manikin-based study was performed using paramedics and critical care doctors (consultants and senior trainees) as participants. Each participant was asked to secure an endotracheal tube that had been placed within the trachea of a manikin a total of six times, the first three times using tied cloth tape and the last three times using a Thomas Endotracheal Tube Holder Following each 'fixation' and after the participant had left the room, the security of the tube was tested by applying a fixed force laterally and to the right by dropping a 1.25 kg weight a distance of 50 cm. The amount of movement of the tube with respect to the teeth was measured and recorded in millimetres. Two-hundred-and-seventy tube fixations (135 tied vs. 135 tube holder) were performed by 45 participants. The degree of tube movement was significantly higher when the tube was secured with a tie compared with when the tube holder was used (median movement 22 mm vs. 4 mm, P < 0. 0001). We have demonstrated that the tube holder device minimised tube movement in a manikin model when compared with conventional tape tying. The use of this device when transporting intubated patients may reduce the risk of tube displacement though further clinical studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 735
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Comparison of tube-taping versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults undergoing surgery in prone position
    Santhosh, M. C. B.
    Torgal, S. V.
    Pai, R. Bhat
    Roopa, S.
    Santoshi, V. B.
    Rao, R. P.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2013, 64 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [2] Comparison of a tube-holder (Rescuefix) versus tape-tying for minimizing double-lumen tube displacement during lateral positioning in thoracic surgery A prospective, randomized controlled study
    Byun, Sung Hye
    Kang, Su Hwang
    Kim, Jong Hae
    Ryu, Taeha
    Kim, Baek Jin
    Jung, Jin Yong
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (31)
  • [3] A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation
    Buckley, Jack C.
    Brown, Adam P.
    Shin, John S.
    Rogers, Kirsten M.
    Hoftman, Nir N.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (05): : 1439 - 1443
  • [4] The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
    Janna S. Landsperger
    Jesse M. Byram
    Bradley D. Lloyd
    Todd W. Rice
    Critical Care, 23
  • [5] The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
    Landsperger, Janna S.
    Byram, Jesse M.
    Lloyd, Bradley D.
    Rice, Todd W.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1):
  • [6] Accidental enteral feeding tube dislodgement with the use of a dedicated feeding tube attachment device versus adhesive tape as the securing method: a randomized clinical trial
    Silva de Assis, Michelli Cristina
    Teixeira Macedo, Andreia Barcellos
    Alves Gazal, Claudia Hallal
    de Souza Martins, Celia Mariana Barbosa
    Viana, Luciana Vercoza
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2019, 36 (03) : 504 - 509