Quantitative measurements of GDF-8 using immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS

被引:16
|
作者
Palandra, Joe [1 ]
Quazi, Amira [2 ]
Fitz, Lori [2 ]
Rong, Haojing [2 ]
Morris, Carl [2 ]
Neubert, Hendrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Worldwide Res & Dev, 1 Burtt Rd, Andover, MA 01810 USA
[2] Pfizer Worldwide Res & Dev, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Biomarkers; GDF-8; immunoaffinity; LC-MS/MS; nanospray; protein quantitation; MUSCLE MASS; MYOSTATIN; TARGETS; ANTIBODIES; PROTEINS; PK/PD; ELISA; SERUM;
D O I
10.1002/prca.201500112
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Purpose: Growth and differentiation factor 8 (GDF-8) is a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass and targeted by inhibitors to treat diseases associated with muscle loss. In order to enable clinical and translational investigations of GDF-8 inhibitors, specific and sensitive measurements of GDF-8 are necessary. Experimental design: An immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS assay for quantification of GDF-8 in serum was developed, qualified and implemented. The workflow includes offline enrichment of GDF-8 using an anti-GDF-8 antibody, followed by isolation using magnetic beads, trypsin digestion, and quantification using 2D nanoflow LC-MS/MS. Results: This assay was qualified in human serum with a lower LOQ of 1.0 ng/mL based on the intact protein. GDF-8 was quantified in serum from juvenile and adult humans as well as mouse, rat, and cynomolgus monkey. Additionally, the assay was utilized to demonstrate an increase of total GDF-8 in serum following administration of an anti-GDF-8 monoclonal antibody therapeutic in cynomolgus monkeys. Conclusions and clinical relevance: A specific and sensitive method was developed for the measurement of GDF-8 in juvenile and adult serum samples as well as preclinical species. The confident quantification of GDF-8 now enables a greater understanding of any association between changes GDF-8 levels and muscle mass.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 604
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protein Turnover Measurements in Human Serum by Serial Immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS
    Farrokhi, Vahid
    Chen, Xiaoying
    Neubert, Hendrik
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 64 (02) : 279 - 288
  • [2] Quantitative electrospray LC-MS and LC-MS/MS in biomedicine
    Carrascal, M
    Schneider, K
    Calaf, RE
    van Leeuwen, S
    Canosa, D
    Gelpí, E
    Abian, J
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 17 (6-7) : 1129 - 1138
  • [3] Enantiomer separation in immunoaffinity LC-MS
    Hofstetter, Oliver
    Zeleke, Jessica M.
    Smith, Gregory B.
    Hofstetter, Heike
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U284 - U285
  • [4] Quantitative analysis of factor P (Properdin) in monkey serum using immunoaffinity capturing in combination with LC-MS/MS
    Gao, Xinliu
    Lin, Hui
    Krantz, Carsten
    Garnier, Arlette
    Flarakos, Jimmy
    Tse, Francis L. S.
    Li, Wenkui
    BIOANALYSIS, 2016, 8 (05) : 425 - 438
  • [5] Chapter 8: Quantitative LC-MS of proteins
    Stöhr G.
    Tebbe A.
    RSC Chromatography Monographs, 2011, : 104 - 122
  • [6] Circulating Concentrations of GDF8, but not GDF11, are Heritable when Evaluated by LC-MS/MS
    Bumgardner, Sara A.
    Pazdro, Robert
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2017, 31
  • [7] Quantification of biotherapeutic targets: new opportunities with immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS
    Neubert, Hendrik
    Palandra, Joe
    Ocana, Mireia Fernandez
    BIOANALYSIS, 2014, 6 (13) : 1731 - 1733
  • [8] Immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS for quantitative determination of a free and total protein target as a target engagement biomarker
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Gu, Huidong
    Shipkova, Petia
    Ciccimaro, Eugene
    Sun, Huadong
    Zhao, Qihong
    Olah, Timothy V.
    BIOANALYSIS, 2017, 9 (20) : 1573 - 1588
  • [9] Quantitative determination of cationic modified polysaccharides on hair using LC-MS and LC-MS-MS
    Ungewiss, J
    Vietzke, JP
    Rapp, C
    Schmidt-Lewerkühne, H
    Wittern, KP
    Salzer, R
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 381 (07) : 1401 - 1407
  • [10] LC-MS in quantitative analysis
    Niessen, WMA
    REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (3-4): : 289 - 301