Experimental study on model- vs. learning-based slip detection

被引:0
|
作者
Rosset, Luciano Menasce [1 ]
Florek-Jasinska, Monika [2 ]
Suppa, Michael [2 ]
Roa-Garzon, Maximo A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Roboception GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Vision and proprioception are traditional sources of information for robotic grasping, but they are insufficient to achieve a stable grasp without slippage or without applying an excessive force on the object. Tactile sensors can aid in this problem by providing spatial and temporal data on the contact between fingertips and object. In this work, tactile fingertip sensors are used to detect slippage through two separate methods: the first, using principles inspired by human tactile sensing, and the second, by using a convolutional neural network trained with suitably labeled test samples. To perform a fair comparison of the methods, two evaluations are performed using a test bench and a pick-and-place robotic application. Results show promising use of the model-based method to avoid translational slippage, as it was able to consistently keep objects from slipping without overloading the grasp. Limitations of both model- and learning-based approaches are identified and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 500
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hybrid model- and learning-based fault diagnosis in adaptive buildings
    Stiefelmaier, Jonas
    Boehm, Michael
    Sawodny, Oliver
    Tarin, Cristina
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2024, 151
  • [2] Catheter Tracking: Filter-Based vs. Learning-Based
    Brost, Alexander
    Wimmer, Andreas
    Liao, Rui
    Hornegger, Joachim
    Strobel, Norbert
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2010, 6376 : 293 - +
  • [3] A Combined Model- and Learning-Based Framework for Interaction-Aware Maneuver Prediction
    Bahram, Mohammad
    Hubmann, Constantin
    Lawitzky, Andreas
    Aeberhard, Michael
    Wollherr, Dirk
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (06) : 1538 - 1550
  • [4] Machine learning-based detection of cardiovascular disease using ECG signals: performance vs. complexity
    Pham, Huy
    Egorov, Konstantin
    Kazakov, Alexey
    Budennyy, Semen
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [5] Model- and Deep Learning-Based Bandwidth and Carrier Frequency Allocation in Distributed Radar Networks
    Chalise, Batu K.
    Martone, Anthony F.
    Kirk, Benjamin H.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2023, 59 (06) : 8022 - 8036
  • [6] Surfing Virtual Waves to Thermal Tomography: From model- to deep learning-based reconstructions
    Kovacs, Peter
    Lehner, Bernhard
    Thummerer, Gregor
    Mayr, Guenther
    Burgholzer, Peter
    Huemer, Mario
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2022, 39 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [7] Learning-Based Slip Detection for Dexterous Manipulation Using GelStereo Sensing
    Cui, Shaowei
    Wang, Shuo
    Wang, Rui
    Zhang, Shaolin
    Zhang, Chaofan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (10) : 13691 - 13700
  • [8] The Cost of Learning: Efficiency vs. Efficacy of Learning-Based RRM for 6G
    Lahmer, Seyyidahmed
    Chiariotti, Federico
    Zanella, Andrea
    ICC 2023-IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, : 5166 - 5172
  • [9] Model- vs. data-based approaches applied to fault diagnosis in potable water supply networks
    Cuguero-Escofet, M. A.
    Quevedo, J.
    Alippi, C.
    Roveri, M.
    Puig, V.
    Garcia, D.
    Trovo, F.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2016, 18 (05) : 831 - 850
  • [10] A Comparative Study: Deformable Contour Propagation Vs. Deep Learning-Based Auto-Contouring for Mrgrt
    Sun, S. H.
    Tseng, W. C.
    Liu, C.
    Yan, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7795 - 7795