SMILE and Wavefront-Guided LASIK Out-Compete Other Refractive Surgeries in Ameliorating the Induction of High-Order Aberrations in Anterior Corneal Surface

被引:34
|
作者
Ye, Min-jie [1 ]
Liu, Cai-yuan [2 ]
Liao, Rong-feng [1 ]
Gu, Zheng-yu [1 ]
Zhao, Bing-ying [1 ]
Liao, Yi [3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Ophthalmol, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Ophthalmol, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Prov Key Lab Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Coll Med, Eye Inst, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; FEMTOSECOND LASER; LENTICULE EXTRACTION; FLAP THICKNESS; EYES; INTRALASE; INCISION; REPRODUCIBILITY; MICROKERATOME; REPEATABILITY;
D O I
10.1155/2016/8702162
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the change of anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (WF-LASIK), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods. In a prospective study, 82 eyes underwent LASIK, 119 eyes underwent WF-LASIK, 88 eyes underwent FS-LASIK, and 170 eyes underwent SMILE surgery. HOAs were measured with Pentacam device preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. The aberrations were described as Zernike polynomials, and analysis focused on total HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), horizontal coma, and vertical coma over 6 mm diameter central corneal zone. Results. Six months postoperatively, all procedures result in increase of anterior corneal total HOAs and SA. There were no significant differences in the induced HOAs between LASIK and FS-LASIK, while SMILE induced fewer total HOAs and SA compared with LASIK and FS-LASIK. Similarly, WF-LASIK also induced less total HOAs than LASIK and FS-LASIK, but only fewer SA than FS-LASIK (p < 0.05). No significant difference could be detected in the induced total HOAs and SA between SMILE and WF-LASIK, whereas SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK (p < 0.05). Conclusion. FS-LASIK and LASIK induced comparable anterior corneal HOAs. Compared to LASIK and FS-LASIK, both SMILE and WF-LASIK showed advantages in inducing less total HOAs. In addition, SMILE also possesses better ability to reduce the induction of SA in comparison with LASIK and FS-LASIK. However, SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK, indicating that the centration of SMILE procedure is probably less precise than WF-LASIK.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Correction and induction of high-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided LASIK and their influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity
    Hammer, T
    Heynemann, M
    Naumann, I
    Duncker, GIW
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2006, 223 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [2] Comparison of wavefront-optimized and corneal wavefront-guided transPRK for high-order aberrations (&gt;0.35 μm) in myopia
    Shao, Ting
    Li, Hua
    Zhang, Jiafan
    Wang, Huifeng
    Liu, Sai
    Long, Keli
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (12): : 1413 - 1418
  • [3] Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations of the Anterior Surface, Posterior Surface, and Total Cornea After SMILE, FS-LASIK, and FLEx Surgeries
    Wu, Wenjing
    Wang, Yan
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 42 (06): : 358 - 365
  • [4] Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Gulmez, Mehmet
    Tekce, Abdulhakim
    Kamis, Umit
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 40 (12) : 3481 - 3489
  • [5] Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Mehmet Gulmez
    Abdulhakim Tekce
    Umit Kamıs
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 3481 - 3489