MDMA (ecstasy) effects in pubescent rats: Males are more sensitive than females

被引:22
|
作者
Koenig, J
Lazarus, C
Jeltsch, H
Ben Hamida, S
Riegert, C
Kelche, C
Jones, BC
Cassel, JC
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg 1, CNRS, UMR 7521,IFR 37, Lab Neurosci Comportementales & Cognit,GDR 2905, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
ecstasy; lethality; locomotor activity; MDMA; pubescence; sexual dimorphism;
D O I
10.1016/j.pbb.2005.04.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In Experiment 1, we assessed the effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on locomotor activity in pubescent male and female Long-Evans rats. Thirty-nine day old rats were injected ip with 10 mg/kg of MDMA (ambient temperature 25 degrees C) three times at 2 h intervals. Initially, females showed greater locomotor activation by the drug than males, however after the second injection, males showed greater hyperlocomotion. After the third injection, 3 of 10 females and all of the males died. In the surviving females, we observed serotonin depletion in cortex and hippocampus, but catecholaminergic markers were unaltered. In Experiment 2, male and female rats were repeatedly injected with saline or 2, 5 or 10 mg/kg MDMA and body temperature was measured (ambient temperature 21.5 degrees C). After the third injection of 10 mg/kg NMMA, the MDMA-induced hyperthermia was greater in males than in females (about +0.8 degrees C); at the lower dose, no difference was observed. Probably because of the lower ambient temperature, only 1 female and 2 males succumbed to the MDMA treatment, and MDMA induced less serotonin depletion than in the first experiment, with no difference between females and males. Thus, pubescent males appear to be more sensitive than females to locomotor and hyperpyretic effects of MDMA. This sex-dependent effect, which is at variance with previously reported dimorphisms in psychostimulant effects, is discussed in terms of possible differences in dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors at pubescence, or other factors related to drug metabolism. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 644
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential adverse effects of oseltamivir in rats: males are more vulnerable than females
    El-Sayed, Wael M.
    Al-Kahtani, Mohamed Ali
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 89 (09) : 623 - 630
  • [2] Female rats are more sensitive to dexmedetomidine hypnosis than males
    Kato, Risako
    Zhang, Edlyn R.
    Moody, Olivia
    Solt, Ken
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 : 45 - 46
  • [3] Climbing task in rats: Females were more intrinsically motivated than males
    Martins, Tamires
    Domingues, Karolina
    Suman, Patrick Remus
    de Oliveira, Cliene Lina
    [J]. LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2022, 77
  • [4] IS HEMODIALYSIS MORE EFFECTIVE IN FEMALES THAN MALES
    MADUELL, F
    SIGUENZA, F
    CARIDAD, A
    MIRALLES, F
    SERRATO, F
    OCHOA, E
    [J]. NEFROLOGIA, 1993, 13 (01): : 47 - 51
  • [5] IS PROSOPAGNOSIA MORE FREQUENT IN MALES THAN IN FEMALES
    MAZZUCCHI, A
    BIBER, C
    [J]. CORTEX, 1983, 19 (04) : 509 - 516
  • [6] Neurotoxic effects of MDMA ("ecstasy") administration to neonatal rats
    Meyer, JS
    Grande, M
    Johnson, K
    Ali, SF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 22 (5-6) : 261 - 271
  • [7] Are males more susceptible to ambient PM than females?
    Mage, DT
    Kretzschmar, JG
    [J]. INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 12 : 145 - 155
  • [8] Why do females care more than males?
    Queller, DC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 264 (1388) : 1555 - 1557
  • [9] Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males
    Cadieux, Michelle L.
    Barnett-Cowan, Michael
    Shore, David I.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 204 (03) : 431 - 446
  • [10] Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males
    Michelle L. Cadieux
    Michael Barnett-Cowan
    David I. Shore
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 204 : 431 - 446