Propensity Score Analysis With Missing Data

被引:47
|
作者
Cham, Heining [1 ]
West, Stephen G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, Dept Psychol, 441 E Fordham Rd, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
propensity score; nonrandomization; missing data; machine learning; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; MATCHING METHODS; REGRESSION; RETENTION; CLASSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; INFERENCE; MODEL; TREES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/met0000076
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Propensity score analysis is a method that equates treatment and control groups on a comprehensive set of measured confounders in observational (nonrandomized) studies. A successful propensity score analysis reduces bias in the estimate of the average treatment effect in a nonrandomized study, making the estimate more comparable with that obtained from a randomized experiment. This article reviews and discusses an important practical issue in propensity analysis, in which the baseline covariates (potential confounders) and the outcome have missing values (incompletely observed). We review the statistical theory of propensity score analysis and estimation methods for propensity scores with incompletely observed covariates. Traditional logistic regression and modern machine learning methods (e.g., random forests, generalized boosted modeling) as estimation methods for incompletely observed covariates are reviewed. Balance diagnostics and equating methods for incompletely observed covariates are briefly described. Using an empirical example, the propensity score estimation methods for incompletely observed covariates are illustrated and compared.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 445
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A FURTHER STUDY OF PROPENSITY SCORE CALIBRATION IN MISSING DATA ANALYSIS
    Han, Peisong
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 2018, 28 (03) : 1307 - 1332
  • [2] A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis
    Jungyeon Choi
    Olaf M. Dekkers
    Saskia le Cessie
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2019, 34 : 23 - 36
  • [3] A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis
    Choi, Jungyeon
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (01) : 23 - 36
  • [4] A multiple robust propensity score method for longitudinal analysis with intermittent missing data
    Chen, Chixiang
    Shen, Biyi
    Liu, Aiyi
    Wu, Rongling
    Wang, Ming
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2021, 77 (02) : 519 - 532
  • [5] Propensity Score Weighting with Missing Data on Covariates and Clustered Data Structure
    Liu, Xiao
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2024, 59 (03) : 411 - 433
  • [6] Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
    Yang, Shu
    Du, Peipei
    Feng, Xixi
    He, Daihai
    Chen, Yaolong
    Zhong, Linda L. D.
    Yan, Xiaodong
    Luo, Jiawei
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
    Shu Yang
    Peipei Du
    Xixi Feng
    Daihai He
    Yaolong Chen
    Linda L. D. Zhong
    Xiaodong Yan
    Jiawei Luo
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [8] EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT MISSING DATA STRATEGIES IN PROPENSITY SCORE ANALYSES
    Driessen, Johanna
    Williamson, Elizabeth
    Carpenter, James
    de Vries, Frank
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : 652 - 652
  • [9] Evaluation Of Different Missing Data Strategies In Propensity Score Analyses
    Driessen, Johanna H. M.
    Williamson, Elizabeth J.
    Carpenter, James R.
    de Vries, Frank
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 154 - 155
  • [10] Authors' Reply: A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis
    Choi, Jungyeon
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (01) : 89 - 91