Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps

被引:75
|
作者
Draganov, Peter V. [1 ]
Chang, Myron N. [2 ]
Alkhasawneh, Ahmad [3 ]
Dixon, Lisa R. [3 ]
Lieb, John [1 ]
Moshiree, Baharak [1 ]
Polyak, Steven [1 ]
Sultan, Shahnaz [1 ]
Collins, Dennis [1 ]
Suman, Amitabh [1 ]
Valentine, John F. [1 ]
Wagh, Mihir S. [1 ]
Habashi, Samir L. [1 ]
Forsmark, Chris E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Med, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy & Res, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol Immunol & Lab Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINE; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Polypectomy with cold biopsy forceps is a frequently used technique for removal of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Jumbo forceps may lead to more effective polypectomy because of the larger size of the forceps cup. Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of cold jumbo biopsy forceps compared with standard forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient endoscopy center. Patients: This study involved 140 patients found to have at least one eligible polyp defined as a sessile polyp measuring <= 6 mm. Intervention: Polypectomy with cold biopsy forceps. Main Outcome Measurements: Complete visual polyp eradication with one forceps bite. Results: In 140 patients, a total of 305 eligible polyps were detected (151 removed with jumbo forceps and 154 with standard forceps). Complete visual eradication of the polyp with one forceps bite was achieved in 78.8% of the jumbo forceps group and 50.7% of the standard forceps group (P < .0001). Biopsies from the polypectomy sites of adenomatous polyps thought to be visually completely eradicated with one bite showed a trend toward a higher complete histologic eradication rate with the jumbo forceps (82.4%) compared with the standard forceps (77.4%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .62). The withdrawal time for visual inspection of the colon and time to perform polypectomies were significantly shorter in the jumbo forceps group (mean 21.43 vs 18.23 minutes; P = .02). Limitations: Lack of blinding to the type of forceps used. Conclusion: The jumbo biopsy forceps is superior to the standard forceps in removing small, sessile polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00855790.) (Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:118-26.)
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 126
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Types of Biopsy Forceps for Polypectomy of Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps
    Draganov, Peter V.
    Chang, Myron N.
    Lieb, John
    Moshiree, Baharak
    Polyak, Steven
    Sultan, Shahnaz
    Collins, Dennis
    Suman, Amitabh
    Valentine, John F.
    Wagh, Mihir S.
    Habashi, Samir L.
    Forsmark, Christopher E.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB194 - AB194
  • [2] Cold Biopsy Polypectomy: Are Jumbo Biopsy Forceps a Better Option Than Standard Forceps in the Removal of Small and Diminutive Colorectal Polyps?
    Ahmed, Faiza
    Iqbal, Muhammad Areeb
    Khan, Israr
    Sajja, Anusha
    Andrews, Kim
    Bobba, Sai Harsha
    Potla, Shanthi
    Aslam, Aysha
    Mezidor, Marc-Darlene
    Yukselen, Zeynep
    Zarrar, Raza
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Shahini, Endrit
    Mohan, Karthik
    Muniraj, Thiruvengadam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S1340 - S1342
  • [3] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Lee, Bo-In
    Choi, Hwang
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Park, Eun Su
    Park, Jae Myung
    Lee, In-Seok
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) : 741 - 747
  • [4] Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Choi, Hyun Ho
    Maeng, I. So
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 90 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [5] STANDARD BIOPSY FORCEPS VERSUS LARGE-CAPACITY FORCEPS WITH AND WITHOUT NEEDLE
    BERNSTEIN, DE
    BARKIN, JS
    REINER, DK
    LUBIN, J
    PHILLIPS, RS
    GRAUER, L
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (06) : 573 - 576
  • [6] Cold biopsy polypectomy: Jumbo versus standard size biopsy forceps
    Borsatto, Ricardo
    Kiafar, Carnron
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB288 - AB289
  • [7] ADEQUATE POLYPECTOMY FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: COLD SNARE VERSUS COLD BIOPSY FORCEPS
    Lamaboglia, F.
    Antoniazzi, S.
    D'Inca, R.
    D'Odorico, A.
    Galeazzi, F.
    Martines, D.
    Russo, F.
    Senzolo, M.
    Sturniolo, G. C.
    Buda, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 : S175 - S175
  • [8] Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chang, Li-Chun
    Chang, Chi-Yang
    Chen, Chi-Yi
    Tseng, Cheng-Hao
    Chen, Peng-Jen
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Hsu, Wen-Feng
    Chen, Yen-Nien
    Chen, Chieh-Chang
    Huang, Tien-Yu
    Tu, Chia-Hung
    Chen, Mei-Jyh
    Chou, Chu-Kuang
    Lee, Ching-Tai
    Chen, Po-Yueh
    Wu, Ming-Shiang
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (03) : 311 - 320
  • [9] Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Higgins, Peter D. R.
    Kwon, Yong M.
    Golembeski, Christopher
    Greenson, Joel K.
    Korsnes, Sheryl J.
    Elta, Grace H.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [10] COMPARISON OF A NEW LARGE-CAPACITY BIOPSY FORCEPS TO A STANDARD FORCEPS - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SEE, JA
    CALLARD, P
    BODIN, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (04) : 329 - 329