Forecasting volatility with asymmetric smooth transition dynamic range models

被引:24
|
作者
Lin, Edward M. H. [1 ]
Chen, Cathy W. S. [1 ]
Gerlach, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Stat, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Univ Sydney, Discipline Operat Management & Econometr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Smooth transition; Volatility model; Threshold variable; Bayesian inference; MCMC methods; AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL DURATION; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.09.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose a nonlinear smooth transition conditional autoregressive range (CARR) model for capturing smooth volatility asymmetries in international financial stock markets, building on recent work on smooth transition conditional duration modelling. An adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme is developed for Bayesian estimation, volatility forecasting and model comparison for the proposed model. The model can capture sign or size asymmetry and heteroskedasticity, such as that which is commonly observed in financial markets. A mixture proposal distribution is developed in order to improve the acceptance rate and the mixing issues which are common in random walk Metropolis-Hastings methods. Further, the logistic transition function is employed and its main properties are considered and discussed in the context of the proposed model, which motivates a suitable, weakly informative prior which ensures a proper posterior distribution and identification of the estimators. The methods are illustrated using simulated data, and an empirical study also provides evidence in favour of the proposed model when forecasting the volatility in two financial stock markets. In addition, the deviance information criterion is employed to compare the proposed models with their limiting classes, the nonlinear threshold CARR models and the symmetric CARR model. (C) 2011 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 399
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volatility forecasting with smooth transition exponential smoothing
    Taylor, JW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2004, 20 (02) : 273 - 286
  • [2] Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence from smooth transition GARCH models
    Ben Cheikh, Nidhaleddine
    Ben Zaied, Younes
    Chevallier, Julien
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [3] Forecasting realized volatility in electricity markets using logistic smooth transition heterogeneous autoregressive models
    Qu, Hui
    Chen, Wei
    Niu, Mengyi
    Li, Xindan
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 : 68 - 76
  • [4] Volatility forecasting with range-eased EGARCH models
    Brandt, Michael W.
    Jones, Christopher S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2006, 24 (04) : 470 - 486
  • [5] Forecasting Volatility of Stocks Return: A Smooth Transition Combining Forecasts
    Ho, Jen Sim
    Choo, Wei Chong
    Lau, Wei Theng
    Yee, Choy Leng
    Zhang, Yuruixian
    Wan, Cheong Kin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (10): : 1 - 13
  • [6] Dynamic asymmetric leverage in stochastic volatility models
    Asai, M
    McAleer, M
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2005, 24 (03) : 317 - 332
  • [7] The Effect of Innovation Assumptions on Asymmetric GARCH Models for Volatility Forecasting
    Acuna, Diego
    Allende-Cid, Hector
    Allende, Hector
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, IMAGE ANALYSIS, COMPUTER VISION, AND APPLICATIONS, CIARP 2015, 2015, 9423 : 527 - 534
  • [8] Forecasting Performance of Asymmetric GARCH Stock Market Volatility Models
    Lee, Ho-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2009, 13 (02): : 109 - 143
  • [9] Asymmetric stable stochastic volatility models: estimation, filtering, and forecasting
    Blasques, Francisco
    Koopman, Siem Jan
    Moussa, Karim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TIME SERIES ANALYSIS, 2024,
  • [10] Realized range volatility forecasting: Dynamic features and predictive variables
    Caporin, Massimiliano
    Velo, Gabriel G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2015, 40 : 98 - 112