Do ponds cause arsenic-pollution of groundwater in the Bengal Basin? An answer from West Bengal

被引:77
|
作者
Sengupta, S. [2 ]
McArthur, J. M. [1 ]
Sarkar, A. [2 ]
Leng, M. J. [3 ]
Ravenscroft, P. [4 ]
Howarth, R. J. [1 ]
Banerjee, D. M. [5 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Earth Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Geol & Geophys, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[3] British Geol Survey, NERC, Isotope Geosci Lab, Keyworth NG12 5GG, Notts, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[5] Univ Delhi, Dept Geol, Delhi 110007, India
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es702988m
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We report time-series data collected over two years for delta O-18, delta H-2, and Ca, Mg, K, and Cl, concentrations for 10 ponds in, and upflow of, an As-polluted region of southern West Bengal. We compare the compositions of As-polluted groundwaters from wells with the compositions of waters in ponds upflow, and within the range of influence, of the wells. Conservative tracers (delta O-18, delta H-2, K), and other tracers (Ca, Mg)that are likely conservative in the waters, show that pond water and groundwater are distinct and do not overlap in composition. These data show that water from ponds cannot be identified in As-polluted groundwater, so putative DOC in pondwater cannot be mixing into the As-polluted groundwater we have sampled. Separate estimates of the degree of recharge from ponds to groundwater, using calculations based on temporal variations in salt content and isotopic composition in ponds, and salt-balance, show that insignificant amounts of As-polluted groundwater are derived via pond recharge. It follows that pondwater in the study area does not contribute significant mass to arsenic-polluted groundwater and so does not provide organic matter to aquifers in amounts sufficient to drive reduction of iron oxyhydroxides and hence arsenic pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:5156 / 5164
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Palaeosol Control of Arsenic Pollution: The Bengal Basin in West Bengal, India
    Ghosal, U.
    Sikdar, P. K.
    McArthur, J. M.
    [J]. GROUNDWATER, 2015, 53 (04) : 588 - 599
  • [2] Arsenic in groundwater, West Bengal
    Aswathanarayana, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 1997, 49 (03) : 341 - 345
  • [3] Arsenic in groundwater, West Bengal
    Radhakrishna, BP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 1996, 48 (02) : 227 - 227
  • [4] Groundwater arsenic pollution affecting deltaic West Bengal, India
    Acharyya, S. K.
    Shah, Babar A.
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2010, 99 (12): : 1787 - 1794
  • [5] Sustainability of groundwater abstraction in the Arsenic-affected Bengal Basin, Bangladesh and West Bengal (India)
    Ravenscroft, Peter
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 74 (12) : A851 - A851
  • [6] Nature of arsenic pollutants in groundwater of Bengal basin - A case study from Baruipur area, West Bengal, India
    Pal, T
    Mukherjee, PK
    Sengupta, S
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (05): : 554 - 561
  • [7] Arsenic pollution in groundwater of West Bengal, India: Where we stand?
    Chandrasekharam, D.
    [J]. NATURAL ARSENIC IN GROUNDWATER: OCCURRENCE, REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, : 25 - 29
  • [8] Deeper groundwater chemistry and geochemical modeling of the arsenic affected western Bengal basin, West Bengal, India
    Mukherjee, Abhijit
    Fryar, Alan E.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 23 (04) : 863 - 894
  • [9] Pollution of groundwater by arsenic: A small-scale survey in West Bengal.
    McArthur, JM
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U584 - U584
  • [10] Assessment of arsenic exposure from groundwater and rice in Bengal Delta Region, West Bengal, India
    Chatterjee, Debashis
    Haider, Dipti
    Majumder, Santanu
    Biswas, Ashis
    Nath, Bibhash
    Bhattacharya, Prosun
    Bhowmick, Subhamoy
    Mukherjee-Goswami, Aishwarya
    Saha, Debasree
    Hazra, Rasmani
    Maity, Palash B.
    Chatterjee, Debankur
    Mukherjee, Abhijit
    Bundschuh, Jochen
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (19) : 5803 - 5812