Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays

被引:116
|
作者
Schettino, G
Folkard, M
Prise, KM
Vojnovic, B
Held, KD
Michael, BD
机构
[1] Mt Vernon Hosp, Gray Canc Inst, Northwood HA6 2JR, Middx, England
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1667/RR3060
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Gray Cancer Institute ultrasoft X-ray microprobe was used to quantify the bystander response of individual V79 cells exposed to a focused carbon K-shell (278 eV) X-ray beam. The ultrasoft X-ray microprobe is designed to precisely assess the biological response of individual cells irradiated in vitro with a very fine beam of low-energy photons. Characteristic C-K X rays are generated by a focused beam of 10 keV electrons striking a graphite target. Circular diffraction gratings (i.e. zone plates) are then employed to focus the X-ray beam into a spot with a radius of 0.25 mum at the sample position. Using this microbeam technology, the correlation between the irradiated cells and their nonirradiated neighbors can be examined critically. The survival response of V79 cells irradiated with a C-K X-ray beam was measured in the 0-2-Gy dose range. The response when all cells were irradiated was compared to that obtained when only a single cell was exposed. The cell survival data exhibit a linear-quadratic response when all cells were targeted (with evidence for hyper-sensitivity at low doses). When only a single cell was targeted within the population, 10% cell killing was measured. In contrast to the binary bystander behavior reported by many other investigations, the effect detected was initially dependent on dose (<200 mGy) and then reached a plateau (>200 mGy). In the low-dose region (<200 mGy), the response after irradiation of a single cell was not significantly different from that when all cells were exposed to radiation. Damaged cells were distributed uniformly over the area of the dish scanned (similar to25 mm(2)). However, critical analysis of the distance of the damaged, unirradiated cells from other damaged cells revealed the presence of clusters of damaged cells produced under bystander conditions. (C) 2003 by Radiation Research Society.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 511
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-dose studies of cell survival with microbeams: Bystander and direct cell killing
    Prise, KM
    Newman, HC
    Schettino, G
    Folkard, M
    Michael, BD
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2002, 158 (03) : 383 - 383
  • [2] Low-dose binary behavior of bystander cell killing after microbeam irradiation of a single cell with focused CK X rays
    Schettino, G
    Folkard, M
    Michael, BD
    Prise, KM
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2005, 163 (03) : 332 - 336
  • [3] Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve
    Seymour, CB
    Mothersill, C
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2000, 153 (05) : 508 - 511
  • [4] SCOLIOSIS STUDIES WITH LOW-DOSE X-RAYS
    VANDERWALT, MJ
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 71 (06): : 402 - 402
  • [5] CANCERIGENIC EFFECT OF LOW-DOSE X-RAYS
    WISKEMANN, A
    HAUTARZT, 1986, 37 (07): : 415 - 416
  • [6] Dose Response of Soft X-Ray-Induced Bystander Cell Killing Affected by p53 Status
    Tomita, Masanori
    Maeda, Munetoshi
    Kobayashi, Katsumi
    Matsumoto, Hideki
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 179 (02) : 200 - 207
  • [8] Microbeam Studies of Soft X-ray Induced Bystander Cell Killing Using Microbeam X-ray Cell Irradiation System at CRIEPI
    Tomita, Masanori
    Kobayashi, Katsumi
    Maeda, Munetoshi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (03) : 482 - 488
  • [9] Microbeam studies of low-dose X-ray bystander effects on epithelial cells and fibroblasts using synchrotron radiation
    Thompson, AC
    Blakely, EA
    Bjornstad, KA
    Chang, PY
    Rosen, CJ
    Sudar, D
    Schwarz, RI
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2004, 161 (01) : 101 - 102
  • [10] The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon
    Nuta, Otilia
    Darroudi, Firouz
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2008, 47 (02) : 265 - 274