On-Target CRISPR/Cas9 Activity Can Cause Undesigned Large Deletion in Mouse Zygotes

被引:26
|
作者
Korablev, Alexey [1 ]
Lukyanchikova, Varvara [1 ,2 ]
Serova, Irina [1 ]
Battulin, Nariman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Cytol & Genet SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[2] Novosibirsk State Univ, Lab Struct & Funct Genome Org, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
关键词
CRISPR; Cas9; on-target deletions; large deletion; truncation; cytoplasmic microinjections; zygotic microinjections; Kit knockout mice; ONE-STEP GENERATION; KIT GENE; CAS9; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; CRISPR-CAS9; NUCLEASES; DOMINANT-WHITE; GENOME; MUTATIONS; MICE; VARIANTS; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.3390/ijms21103604
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genome engineering has been tremendously affected by the appearance of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9)-based approach. Initially discovered as an adaptive immune system for prokaryotes, the method has rapidly evolved over the last decade, overtaking multiple technical challenges and scientific tasks and becoming one of the most effective, reliable, and easy-to-use technologies for precise genomic manipulations. Despite its undoubtable advantages, CRISPR/Cas9 technology cannot ensure absolute accuracy and predictability of genomic editing results. One of the major concerns, especially for clinical applications, is mutations resulting from error-prone repairs of CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand DNA breaks. In some cases, such error-prone repairs can cause unpredicted and unplanned large genomic modifications within the CRISPR/Cas9 on-target site. Here we describe the largest, to the best of our knowledge, undesigned on-target deletion with a size of similar to 293 kb that occurred after the cytoplasmic injection of CRISPR/Cas9 system components into mouse zygotes and speculate about its origin. We suppose that deletion occurred as a result of the truncation of one of the ends of a double-strand break during the repair.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving CRISPR/ Cas9 On-target Specificity
    Jamal, Muhammad
    Ullah, Arif
    Naeem, Muhammad Ahsan
    Tyagi, Rohit
    Habib, Zeshan
    Rehman, Khaista
    CURRENT ISSUES IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 26 : 65 - 80
  • [2] The possibilities and limitations of CRISPR/Cas9 in mouse zygotes
    Boroviak, Katharina
    Doe, Brendan
    Bradley, Allan
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (02) : 214 - 214
  • [3] Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing
    Mitchell L. Leibowitz
    Stamatis Papathanasiou
    Phillip A. Doerfler
    Logan J. Blaine
    Lili Sun
    Yu Yao
    Cheng-Zhong Zhang
    Mitchell J. Weiss
    David Pellman
    Nature Genetics, 2021, 53 : 895 - 905
  • [4] CRISPR–Cas9 can cause chromothripsis
    Fyodor D. Urnov
    Nature Genetics, 2021, 53 : 768 - 769
  • [5] Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
    Wefers, Benedikt
    Bashir, Sanum
    Rossius, Jana
    Wurst, Wolfgang
    Kuehn, Ralf
    METHODS, 2017, 121 : 55 - 67
  • [6] Detection and quantification of unintended large on-target gene modifications due to CRISPR/Cas9 editing
    Park, So Hyun
    Cao, Mingming
    Bao, Gang
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 28
  • [7] Chromosome engineering in zygotes with CRISPR/Cas9
    Boroviak, Katharina
    Doe, Brendan
    Banerjee, Ruby
    Yang, Fengtang
    Bradley, Allan
    GENESIS, 2016, 54 (02) : 78 - 85
  • [8] CrnnCrispr: An Interpretable Deep Learning Method for CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA On-Target Activity Prediction
    Zhu, Wentao
    Xie, Huanzeng
    Chen, Yaowen
    Zhang, Guishan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (08)
  • [9] ] CRISPRpred: A flexible and efficient tool for sgRNAs on-target activity prediction in CRISPR/Cas9 systems
    Rahman, Md. Khaledur
    Rahman, M. Sohel
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [10] Deletion of a target gene in Indica rice via CRISPR/Cas9
    Ying Wang
    Lizhao Geng
    Menglong Yuan
    Juan Wei
    Chen Jin
    Min Li
    Kun Yu
    Ya Zhang
    Huaibing Jin
    Eric Wang
    Zhijian Chai
    Xiangdong Fu
    Xianggan Li
    Plant Cell Reports, 2017, 36 : 1333 - 1343