Evaluating the Variability of Surface Soil Moisture Simulated Within CMIP5 Using SMAP Data

被引:4
|
作者
Xi, Xuan [1 ]
Gentine, Pierre [2 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Seungbum [4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth Environm Engn, New York, NY USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] NASA, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; IN-SITU; MEMORY; PRECIPITATION; TERRESTRIAL; VALIDATION; RETRIEVAL; SPECTRUM; CARBON; MODEL;
D O I
10.1029/2021JD035363
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
There are significant biases and uncertainties in the simulated soil moisture with land surface models. Here we evaluate multimodel differences in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) compared to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) products on different time scales. The variability of surface soil moisture (SSM) within three frequency bands (7-30 days, 30-90 days, and 90-365 days) after normalization is quantified using Fourier transform for the evaluation. Compared to the SMAP observations, the simulated SSM variability within CMIP5 is underestimated in the two higher frequency bands (by 72% and 56%, respectively) and overestimated in the lowest frequency band (by 113%). In addition, these differences concentrate in regions with larger SSM. Finally, these multimodel differences are found to be significantly correlated with mean climate conditions rather than soil texture. This study identifies the spatiotemporal distribution of the model deficiencies within CMIP5 and finds they are systematic in the long-term simulation on a global scale. Plain Language Summary Soil moisture has been largely regarded as a key variable in Earth system and plays an important role in climate prediction. However, land surface models have large uncertainties in simulating soil moisture. This study identifies that (a) land surface models underestimate soil moisture variability on weekly to seasonal time scales and overestimate it on seasonal to annual time scales compared to a remote sensing observation, (b) both the underestimation and overestimation are concentrated in the wetter regions, and (c) the differences between these models and the observation are more closely related to vegetation condition and surface temperature than soil sand and clay content. Using satellite observed data, this study reveals the deficiencies of land surface models in simulating temporal variability of soil moisture, which will help improve the soil moisture predictability of these models.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Effects of Precipitation and Evapotranspiration on Soil Moisture Variability Within CMIP5 Using SMAP and ERA5 Data
    Xi, Xuan
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Kim, Seungbum
    Gentine, Pierre
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2023, 59 (05)
  • [2] Soil Moisture-Evapotranspiration Coupling in CMIP5 Models: Relationship with Simulated Climate and Projections
    Berg, Alexis
    Sheffield, Justin
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (12) : 4865 - 4878
  • [3] Evaluating the drought response of CMIP5 models using global gross primary productivity, leaf area, precipitation, and soil moisture data
    Huang, Yuanyuan
    Gerber, Stefan
    Huang, Tongyi
    Lichstein, Jeremy W.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2016, 30 (12) : 1827 - 1846
  • [4] Evaluating biases in simulated land surface albedo from CMIP5 global climate models
    Li, Yue
    Wang, Tao
    Zeng, Zhenzhong
    Peng, Shushi
    Lian, Xu
    Piao, Shilong
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (11) : 6178 - 6190
  • [5] Downscaling of SMAP Soil Moisture Using Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation Data
    Fang, Bin
    Lakshmi, Venkataraman
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (01)
  • [6] SST and ENSO variability and change simulated in historical experiments of CMIP5 models
    Jha, Bhaskar
    Hu, Zeng-Zhen
    Kumar, Arun
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 2113 - 2124
  • [7] SST and ENSO variability and change simulated in historical experiments of CMIP5 models
    Bhaskar Jha
    Zeng-Zhen Hu
    Arun Kumar
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 2113 - 2124
  • [8] Evaluating ENSO teleconnections using observations and CMIP5 models
    Indrani Roy
    Alexandre S. Gagnon
    Devendraa Siingh
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019, 136 : 1085 - 1098
  • [9] Evaluating ENSO teleconnections using observations and CMIP5 models
    Roy, Indrani
    Gagnon, Alexandre S.
    Siingh, Devendraa
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 136 (3-4) : 1085 - 1098
  • [10] Multidecadal Variability in Surface Albedo Feedback Across CMIP5 Models
    Schneider, Adam
    Flanner, Mark
    Perket, Justin
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1972 - 1980