Risk-averse flexible policy on ambulance allocation in humanitarian operations under uncertainty

被引:8
|
作者
Yu, Guodong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Aijun [3 ]
Sun, Huiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Shandong Key Lab Social Supernetwork Computat & D, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Xidian Univ, Dept Management Engn, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ambulance operations; dispatching and relocation; Markov decision process; stochastic dominance; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VEHICLE; RELOCATION; DECISIONS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1735663
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Proactive ambulance management is constructive to improve the response efficiency for emergency medical service (EMS) systems under uncertainty. In this paper, we present a dynamic optimisation model concerning the ambulance dispatching and relocation. We develop a flexible operation policy driven by the interval rolling to match vehicles with calls in batch. We formulate the problem in Markov Decision Process and incorporate queues to minimise the average response and delay time. Considering the curse-of-dimensionality, we provide a simulation-based empirical dynamic programming with the state aggregation and post-decision state to solve the model. To further accelerate the computational efficiency, a greedy heuristic method is introduced to improve the quality of sampling operations. Then, a risk-averse model is developed based on the stochastic dominance strategy to improve operational reliability. We develop an equivalent linear programming to evaluate concave dominating functions. We test the performance by a numerical case and extract managerial insights for practitioners. Our results show that the proposed flexible and risk-averse solution outperforms the classic model on reducing the delay under uncertain calls. And the improvement is more active during peak hours, when real-time needs exceed available ambulances.
引用
收藏
页码:2588 / 2610
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ALLOCATION OF EFFORT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - CASE OF RISK-AVERSE BEHAVIOR
    BLOCK, MK
    HEINEKE, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (02) : 376 - 385
  • [2] Risk-Averse Planning Under Uncertainty
    Ahmadi, Mohamadreza
    Ono, Masahiro
    Ingham, Michel D.
    Murray, Richard M.
    Ames, Aaron D.
    [J]. 2020 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2020, : 3305 - 3312
  • [4] Risk-Averse Decision Making Under Uncertainty
    Ahmadi, Mohamadreza
    Rosolia, Ugo
    Ingham, Michel D.
    Murray, Richard M.
    Ames, Aaron D.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (01) : 55 - 68
  • [5] Decomposition Algorithms for Risk-Averse Multistage Stochastic Programs with Application to Water Allocation under Uncertainty
    Zhang, Weini
    Rahimian, Hamed
    Bayraksan, Guzin
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2016, 28 (03) : 385 - 404
  • [6] A Risk-Averse Newsvendor Model Under the Framework of Uncertainty Theory
    Zhang, Shengzhong
    Yu, Yingmin
    Li, Jidong
    Zhu, Qihong
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 182632 - 182642
  • [7] A Risk-averse Two-stage Stochastic Optimization Model for Water Resources Allocation under Uncertainty
    Xu, Ye
    Li, Sha
    Liu, Feng
    Qian, Jinping
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Cheng, Guanhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 6 (01) : 71 - 82
  • [8] CLIMATE POLICY Risk-averse governments
    Harris, Paul G.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (04) : 245 - 246
  • [9] Risk-averse stochastic programming approach for microgrid planning under uncertainty
    Narayan, Apurva
    Ponnambalam, Kumaraswamy
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 101 : 399 - 408
  • [10] A Multi-objective Risk-averse Workforce Planning under Uncertainty
    Jalalvand, Fatemeh
    Turan, Hasan Huseyin
    Elsawah, Sondoss
    Ryan, Michael J.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, : 1626 - 1633