Unilateral Upper Extremity Transverse Deficiencies: Prosthetic Use and Function

被引:0
|
作者
James, Michelle A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Div Pediat Orthopaed, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Shriners Hosp No Calif, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
prosthesis; upper extremity; transverse deficiency; below elbow deficiency; function; UPPER-LIMB DEFICIENCY; BELOW-ELBOW DEFICIENCY; CONGENITAL TRANSVERSE; REDUCTION DEFICIENCY; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; CHILDREN; HAND; ARM; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181cd9eba
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Children with upper extremity transverse deficiency are assumed to have significant disability associated with their malformation, and use of prosthesis has been presumed to be necessary to reduce this disability. However, standardized methods of measuring function and prosthesis use have not been widely applied to this population, and their prosthesis rejection rates are high. Methods: This article reviews the measurement of hand function in children, and evidence regarding the usefulness of prostheses for children with transverse deficiency. Results: There are several different questionnaires and function tests available to measure hand function in children. Most are specialized, time consuming and incompletely validated. Conclusion: Children with transverse deficiency have close to normal function and quality of life, and prosthesis use is not associated with improvements in these areas. Further research is needed to develop better methods of measuring function. Currently available prostheses may help with social acceptance or be useful as tools for specific activities, but they do not improve daily function or quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:S40 / S44
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upper extremity deficiencies
    Ezaki, M
    CHILD WITH A LIMB DEFICIENCY, 1998, : 381 - 385
  • [2] FACTORS RELATED TO SUCCESSFUL UPPER EXTREMITY PROSTHETIC USE
    ROESCHLEIN, RA
    DOMHOLDT, E
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 13 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [3] Prosthetic replacement of the upper extremity after amputation or loss of function
    Salminger, Stefan
    Mayer, Johannes A.
    Sturma, Agnes
    Aszmann, Oskar C.
    MANUELLE MEDIZIN, 2019, 57 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [4] Prosthetic reconstruction of the upper extremity
    Salminger, S.
    Mayer, J. A.
    Sturma, A.
    Riedl, O.
    Bergmeister, K. D.
    Aszmann, O. C.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2016, 119 (05): : 408 - 413
  • [5] Upper Extremity Prosthetic Technology and Care
    Blanck R.V.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2014, 2 (4) : 290 - 299
  • [6] Innovations in Prosthetic Interfaces for the Upper Extremity
    Kung, Theodore A.
    Bueno, Reuben A.
    Alkhalefah, Ghadah K.
    Langhals, Nicholas B.
    Urbanchek, Melanie G.
    Cederna, Paul S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (06) : 1515 - 1523
  • [7] UPPER EXTREMITY PROSTHETIC TRAINING ARM
    BAILEY, RB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1970, 24 (05): : 357 - 359
  • [8] The pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) and functional assessment of patients with unilateral upper extremity deficiencies
    Lerman, JA
    Sullivan, E
    Barnes, DA
    Haynes, RJ
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 25 (03) : 405 - 407
  • [9] SCOLIOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH CONGENITAL DEFICIENCIES OF UPPER EXTREMITY
    MAKLEY, JT
    HEIPLE, KG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1970, A 52 (02): : 279 - &
  • [10] The effect of contextual interference on acquiring use of an upper-extremity prosthetic simulator
    Weeks, DL
    Davis, J
    DeCianne, P
    Logston, K
    Koffler, P
    Vernon, K
    Zink, L
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 24 : 132 - 133