Age, health and other factors associated with return to work for those engaging with a welfare-to-work initiative: a cohort study of administrative data from the UK's Work Programme

被引:7
|
作者
Brown, Judith [1 ]
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal [2 ]
Leyland, Alastair H. [2 ]
McQuaid, Ronald W. [3 ]
Frank, John [4 ]
Macdonald, Ewan B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Hlth Working Lives Grp, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Stirling, Management Work & Org, Stirling, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 10期
关键词
EMPLOYMENT STATUS; LABOR-MARKET; EMPLOYABILITY; DISABILITY; SUPPORT; TRAJECTORIES; ATTITUDES; SICKNESS; PEOPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the role of individual factors (including age, health and personal circumstances) and external factors associated with clients having a job start while engaging with the Work Programme and variations by benefit type. Setting The UK Government's main return to work initiative (The Work Programme) in Scotland. Design Piecewise Poisson regression to calculate incident rate ratios using administrative data from 2013 to 2016 to identify factors associated with job start. Participants 4322 Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) clients not in work due to poor health and 8996 Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) clients, aged 18-64 years, referred to the Work Programme between April 2013 and July 2014. Main outcome measures Starting a job and the time to first job start after entering the Work Programme. Results JSA clients (62%) were more likely to return to work (RTW) than ESA clients (20%). There is a strong negative relationship between age and the predicted probability of having a job start during the 2-year engagement with the programme for both JSA and ESA clients. JSA clients were most likely to RTW in the first 3 months, while for ESA clients the predicted probability of having a first job start was fairly constant over the 2 years. Health, including the number of health conditions, length of unemployment, client perception of job start and other individual factors were associated with job starts for both groups. Conclusions Age plays an important role in influencing RTW; however, important potentially modifiable factors include the length of unemployment, the management of multimorbidity and the individual's perception of the likelihood of job start. Future welfare-to-work programmes may be improved by providing age-specific interventions which focus on health and biopsychosocial factors to enable more people to realise the potential health benefits of RTW.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating sustainability in work after participating in a welfare-to-work initiative using a 2-year cohort study of Work Programme participants in Scotland
    Brown, Judith
    Walker, Simon Harold
    Mcquaid, Ronald W.
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Leyland, Alastair H.
    Frank, John
    Mackay, Daniel
    Macdonald, Ewan
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [2] Linking primary study data with administrative and claims data in a German cohort study on work, age, health and work participation: is there a consent bias?
    Stallmann, C.
    Swart, E.
    Robra, B. -P.
    March, S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 150 : 9 - 16
  • [3] Mental health and other factors associated with work productivity after injury in the UK: multicentre cohort study
    Kellezi, Blerina
    Dhiman, Paula
    Coupland, Carol
    Whitehead, Joanne
    Morriss, Richard
    Joseph, Stephen
    Beckett, Kate
    Sleney, Jude
    Barnes, Jo
    Kendrick, Denise
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [4] Factors associated with the school exclusion gap for children with social work involvement: A retrospective cohort study using national administrative data
    Hood, Rick
    Goldacre, Allie
    Jones, Edward
    Martin, Emma
    Clements, Keith
    Webb, Calum
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2024,
  • [5] Protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal study to identify factors influencing return to work in the over 50s participating in the UK Work Programme: Supporting Older People into Employment (SOPIE)
    Brown, Judith
    Neary, Joanne
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Thomson, Hilary
    McQuaid, Ronald W.
    Leyland, Alastair H.
    Frank, John
    Jeavons, Luke
    de Pellette, Paul
    Kiran, Sibel
    Macdonald, Ewan B.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12):
  • [6] Return to Work After Depression-Related Absence by Employees With and Without Other Health Conditions: A Cohort Study
    Ervasti, Jenni
    Vahtera, Jussi
    Pentti, Jaana
    Oksanen, Tuula
    Ahola, Kirsi
    Kivekas, Teija
    Kivimaki, Mika
    Virtanen, Marianna
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2015, 77 (02): : 126 - 135
  • [7] Three-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated with Return to Work After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Myung Kyung Lee
    Han Sung Kang
    Keun Seok Lee
    Eun Sook Lee
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2017, 27 : 547 - 558
  • [8] Three-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated with Return to Work After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Lee, Myung Kyung
    Kang, Han Sung
    Lee, Keun Seok
    Lee, Eun Sook
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 27 (04) : 547 - 558
  • [9] Experiences from the frontline: An exploration of personal advisers' practice with claimants who have health-related needs within UK welfare-to-work provision
    Ceolta-Smith, Jenny
    Salway, Sarah
    Tod, Angela Mary
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2018, 26 (04) : E598 - E608
  • [10] Prognostic effects of selection, optimization and compensation strategies on work ability: results from the representative lidA cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany
    Weber, Jeannette
    Mueller, Andreas
    Stiller, Michael
    Borchart, Daniela
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 91 (08) : 1061 - 1071