The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants - A review and critique of methodology

被引:80
|
作者
McPhee, CS [1 ]
Aarssen, LW [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
experimental technique; neighbours; partitions; plant interaction; root competition; shoot competition; target;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011471719799
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The relative merits of different methods for separating root and shoot competition in plants are reviewed. The 'Divided Pot' technique involves vertical partitions that divide above- and below-ground competition within pots. This design usually creates unrealistic competition for light by using artificial barriers around pot perimeters to contain above-ground growth and by using a constant orientation of incident light from directly above. The 'Row' technique involves parallel rows of plants that are separated by vertical partitions above- and below-ground. Although, this design may be well suited to some agricultural applications, its value for field studies of wild plants is limited. The Divided Pot and Row techniques have been associated often with the replacement series design, which has a number of limitations. The 'Target' technique has always been associated with an additive planting design as it involves surrounding a plant of interest (the 'target') with other plants (the 'neighbours') while including above- and below-ground partitions to prevent root and shoot competition. Most studies using this technique have not provided adequate control for apparatus effects, yet this method appears to have the most potential for application in ecological studies, especially in the field. A standard protocol for the target technique is proposed allowing greater control over potential apparatus effects than in previous studies and allowing assessment of the interaction between root competition and shoot competition.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 136
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants A review and critique of methodology
    Christopher S. McPhee
    Lonnie W. Aarssen
    Plant Ecology, 2001, 152 : 119 - 136
  • [2] Above- and below-ground competition cues elicit independent responses
    Murphy, Guillermo P.
    Dudley, Susan A.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2007, 95 (02) : 261 - 272
  • [3] Are above- and below-ground phenology in sync?
    Abramoff, Rose Z.
    Finzi, Adrien C.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2015, 205 (03) : 1054 - 1061
  • [4] Disentangling above- and below-ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest
    Schnitzer, SA
    Kuzee, ME
    Bongers, F
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2005, 93 (06) : 1115 - 1125
  • [5] Effect of sowing proportion on above- and below-ground competition in maize–soybean intercrops
    Yuanyuan Ren
    Li Zhang
    Minfei Yan
    Yanjun Zhang
    Yinglong Chen
    Jairo A. Palta
    Suiqi Zhang
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Above- and below-ground plant traits are not consistent in response to drought and competition treatments
    Asefa, Mengesha
    Worthy, Samantha J.
    Cao, Min
    Song, Xiaoyang
    Lozano, Yudi M.
    Yang, Jie
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2022, 130 (07) : 939 - 950
  • [7] Testing the Growth Rate Hypothesis in Vascular Plants with Above- and Below-Ground Biomass
    Yu, Qiang
    Wu, Honghui
    He, Nianpeng
    Lue, Xiaotao
    Wang, Zhiping
    Elser, James J.
    Wu, Jianguo
    Han, Xingguo
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [8] Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Sequestration in Shelterbelt Trees in Canada: A Review
    Mayrinck, Rafaella C.
    Laroque, Colin P.
    Amichev, Beyhan Y.
    Van Rees, Ken
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (10):
  • [9] Ozone impacts on competition between tomato and yellow nutsedge: Above- and below-ground effects
    Shrestha, A
    Grantz, DA
    CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (04) : 1587 - 1595
  • [10] Responses of Fraxinus excelsior seedlings to grass-induced above- and below-ground competition
    Juliette M. G. Bloor
    Paul W. Leadley
    Laure Barthes
    Plant Ecology, 2008, 194 : 293 - 304