Expectation violations in sensorimotor sequences: shifting from LTM-based attentional selection to visual search

被引:13
|
作者
Foerster, Rebecca M.
Schneider, Werner X.
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Neurocognit Psychol, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Cluster Excellence Cognit Interact Technol, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
attention; eye movements; long-term memory; visual search; sensorimotor action; expectation discrepancy; SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS; REAL-WORLD SCENES; CARD SORTING TEST; TARGET SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; NATURAL TASK; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; REVERSAL; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/nyas.12729
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Long-term memory (LTM) delivers important control signals for attentional selection. LTM expectations have an important role in guiding the task-driven sequence of covert attention and gaze shifts, especially in well-practiced multistep sensorimotor actions. What happens when LTM expectations are disconfirmed? Does a sensory-based visual-search mode of attentional selection replace the LTM-based mode? What happens when prior LTM expectations become valid again? We investigated these questions in a computerized version of the number-connection test. Participants clicked on spatially distributed numbered shapes in ascending order while gaze was recorded. Sixty trials were performed with a constant spatial arrangement. In 20 consecutive trials, either numbers, shapes, both, or no features switched position. In 20 reversion trials, participants worked on the original arrangement. Only the sequence-affecting number switches elicited slower clicking, visual search-like scanning, and lower eye-hand synchrony. The effects were neither limited to the exchanged numbers nor to the corresponding actions. Thus, expectation violations in a well-learned sensorimotor sequence cause a regression from LTM-based attentional selection to visual search beyond deviant-related actions and locations. Effects lasted for several trials and reappeared during reversion.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 59
页数:15
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih, SI
    Sperling, G
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (03) : 758 - 779
  • [2] Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks
    Chapman, Angus F.
    Stormer, Viola S.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2022, 22 (08):
  • [3] Item-based selection is in good shape in visual compound search: A view from electrophysiology
    Toellner, Thomas
    Rangelov, Dragan
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 40 : 44 - 44
  • [5] The Gradual Emergence of Spatially Selective Target Processing in Visual Search: From Feature-Specific to Object-Based Attentional Control
    Eimer, Martin
    Grubert, Anna
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (05) : 1819 - 1831
  • [6] Template-based attentional guidance and generic procedural learning in contextual guided visual search: Evidence from reduced response time variability
    Yang, Hongyu
    Zhu, Shasha
    Liu, Senlin
    Yuan, Lixia
    Xie, Xiaowei
    Zang, Xuelian
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2025, 25 (04):
  • [7] Flexible Feature-Based Inhibition in Visual Search Mediates Magnified Impairments of Selection: Evidence From Carry-Over Effects Under Dynamic Preview-Search Conditions
    Andrews, Lucy S.
    Watson, Derrick G.
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    Braithwaite, Jason J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (04) : 1007 - 1016