Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions

被引:221
|
作者
van Goor, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
adhesiolysis; enterotomy; morbidity; laparoscopy; reoperation; chronic pain;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Consequences and complications of postsurgical intra-abdominal adhesion formation not including small bowel obstruction and secondary infertility are substantial but are under-exposed in the literature. Inadvertent enterotomy during reopening of the abdomen or subsequent adhesion dissection is a feared complication of surgery after previous laparotomy. The incidence can be as high as 20% in open surgery and between 1% and 100% in laparoscopy depending on the underlying disease. Delayed postoperative detection of enterotomy is a particular feature of laparoscopy associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adhesions to the ventral abdominal wall are responsible for the majority of trocar injuries. Both trocar injuries and inadvertent enterotomies result in conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in almost 100% of cases. There is a paucity of data on other organ injury, such as liver laceration or bladder perforation. Dissecting adhesions before executing the planned operation takes on average 20 min, being one-fifth of the total operating time in patients having had previous open colorectal surgery. There is some evidence that postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients who need adhesiolysis is higher than that of patients with a virgin abdomen. The necessity to dissect adhesions is associated with increased hospital stay. Postsurgical adhesions are considered a main reason for conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in many types of procedures including laparoscopic colonic resection. Adhesion formation is part of the innate peritoneal defence mechanism in peritonitis. Abscess formation and bleeding, organ injury and fistula formation at 'on demand' relaparotomies are well-known complications after surgery for intra-abdominal sepsis associated with fibrinous adhesions. The clinical magnitude hereof is poorly researched. Postsurgical adhesions may cause pain as evidenced by pain mapping clinical experiments. Filmy adhesions between movable organs and the peritoneum appear to be worse in terms of generating pain. The high caseload of gynaecological and some colorectal practices suggest an enormous impact of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain on patient's wellbeing and socio-economic costs. The significant risk of inadvertent enterotomy, conversion to laparotomy and trocar injury, and the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality and increased length of hospital stay warrant routine informed consent of adhesiolysis related complications in patients scheduled for abdominal or pelvic reoperation.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery
    不详
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 : S144 - S149
  • [2] Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery
    Fritz, Marc
    Adamson, G. David
    Barnhart, Kurt
    Buster, John
    Catherino, William
    Cedars, Marcelle
    Collins, John
    Licht, Mark
    Liu, James
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Schattman, Glenn
    Scoccia, Humberto
    Thomas, Michael
    West, Elizabeth
    Witt, Barry
    Rebar, Robert
    Frankel, Nancy
    La Barbera, Andrew
    Schlegel, Peter
    Falcone, Tommaso
    Isaacson, Keith
    Luciano, Anthony
    Murphy, Ana
    Tulandi, Togas
    Azziz, Ricardo
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [3] Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion
    Pfeifer, Samantha
    Lobo, Roger
    Goldberg, Jeffrey
    Thomas, Michael
    Pisarska, Margareta
    Widra, Eric
    Licht, Mark
    Sandlow, Jay
    Collins, John
    Cedars, Marcelle
    Vernon, Michael
    Davis, Owen
    Dumesic, Daniel
    Gracia, Clarisa
    Catherino, William
    Odem, Randall
    Thornton, Kim
    Rebar, Robert
    La Barbera, Andrew
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (06) : 1550 - 1555
  • [4] Peritoneal adhesions
    Corbett, JF
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1917, 25 : 166 - 174
  • [5] Peritoneal adhesions
    Harris, D. A.
    Topley, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) : 271 - 272
  • [6] Peritoneal closure and adhesions
    Tulandi, T
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (01) : 249 - U4
  • [7] Papain and peritoneal adhesions
    Elliot, RHE
    Mellney, FL
    SURGERY, 1937, 1 : 785 - 791
  • [8] Prevention of peritoneal adhesions
    不详
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1936, 1936 : 1150 - 1150
  • [9] The nature of peritoneal adhesions
    Keith, A
    LANCET, 1914, 2 : 362 - 365
  • [10] Peritoneal adhesions: pathophysiology
    Fabiano, G.
    Pezzolla, A.
    Maiorino, R.
    Ferrarese, F.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2008, 29 (03): : 115 - 125