Energy cropping and social licence: What's trust got to do with it?

被引:13
|
作者
Baumber, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Transdisciplinary Innovat, Ultimo 2007, Australia
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2018年 / 108卷
关键词
Social licence to operate; Acceptance; Energy crop; Trust; Resilience; Systems thinking; RENEWABLE ENERGY; LAND-USE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOFUELS; COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WIND FARMS; OPERATE; BIOENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.023
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Cellulosic energy crops have been promoted in various jurisdictions for their potential to mitigate climate change and enhance energy security while avoiding some of the negative impacts associated with first-generation biofuel crops. However, the successful expansion of cellulosic energy cropping depends on its acceptance by local communities. The social licence to operate (SLO) concept has been applied in mining and other sectors since the late 1990s and offers a framework for analysing the relationships between energy cropping proponents and local communities. This review analyses recent cellulosic energy cropping studies to determine the extent to which they consider the key SLO variables of distributional fairness, procedural fairness, trust and adaptability. The results indicate that, of these four variables, trust has received the least coverage in previous studies focusing on the social dimensions of cellulosic energy cropping. This review also highlights a contrast between energy cropping studies that applied the SLO concept, all of which explicitly considered trust, and those studies that did not apply the SLO concept. This result highlights the potential role that the SLO concept could play in ensuring that the importance of trust is not overlooked by researchers, bioenergy proponents or policy-makers.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnosing death: What's trust got to do with it?
    Stell, LK
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 66 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [2] Rethinking PKI: What's trust got to do with it?
    Kent, S
    ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2002, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2332 : 398 - 399
  • [3] The Discipline Gap: What's Trust Got to Do With It?
    Romero, Lisa S.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2018, 120 (11):
  • [4] What's trust got to do with it? Revisiting opioid contracts
    Buchman, Daniel Z.
    Ho, Anita
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2014, 40 (10) : 673 - 677
  • [5] Privacy in a Semantic Cloud: What's Trust Got to Do with It?
    Nyre, Asmund Ahlmann
    Jaatun, Martin Gilje
    CLOUD COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5931 : 107 - 118
  • [6] What's Trust Got to Do With It? Trust and the Importance of the Research-Care Distinction
    Largent, Emily A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2015, 15 (09): : 22 - 24
  • [7] What's Trust Got To Do With It? Ensuring Meaningful Community Engagement
    Plunk, Andrew
    Gehlert, Sarah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04): : 53 - 55
  • [8] What's EF Got to Do, Got to Do With It?
    Kass, David A.
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146 (18) : 1327 - 1328
  • [9] Ending Poverty: ''What's Social Marketing Got to Do With It?''
    Lee, Nancy R.
    Kotler, Philip
    SOCIAL MARKETING QUARTERLY, 2009, 15 (04) : 134 - 140
  • [10] Social entrepreneur and gender: what's personality got to do with it?
    Bernardino, Susana
    Freitas Santos, J.
    Cadima Ribeiro, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2018, 10 (01) : 61 - 82