The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis

被引:135
|
作者
McFarlane, PA
Bayoumi, AM
Pierratos, A
Redelmeier, DA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med,Inner City Hlth Res Unit, Home Dialysis Clin, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Humber River Reg Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
economic analysis; hemodialysis; home; prospective studies; resource allocation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is an intensive form of hemodialysis, where patients perform their treatments at home for about 7 hours approximately 6 nights a week. Compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis, home nocturnal hemodialysis has been shown to improve physiologic parameters and reduce health care costs; however, the effects on quality of life and cost utility are less clear. We hypothesized that individuals performing home nocturnal hemodialysis would have a higher quality of life and superior cost utility than in-center hemodialysis patients. Methods. Home nocturnal hemodialysis patients and a demographically similar group of in-center hemodialysis patients from a hospital without a home hemodialysis program underwent computer-assisted interviews to assess their utility score for current health by the standard gamble method. Results. Nineteen in-center hemodialysis and 24 home nocturnal hemodialysis patients were interviewed. Mean annual costs for home nocturnal hemodialysis were about $10,000 lower for home nocturnal hemodialysis ($55,139 +/-$7651 for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. $66,367 +/-$17,502 for in-center hemodialysis, P = 0.03). Home nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with a higher utility score than in-center hemodialysis (0.77 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.35, P = 0.03). The cost utility for home nocturnal hemodialysis was $71,443/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), while for in-center hemodialysis it was $125,845/QALY. Home nocturnal hemodialysis was the dominant strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$45,932. The 95% CI for the ICER, and 2500 bootstrap iterations of the ICER all fell below the cost-effectiveness ceiling of $50,000. The net monetary benefit of home nocturnal hemodialysis ranged from $11,227 to $35,669. Conclusion. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is associated with a higher quality of life and a superior cost utility when compared to in-center hemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1011
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis
    McFarlane, PA
    Pierratos, A
    Redelmeier, DA
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 62 (06) : 2216 - 2222
  • [2] Home hemodialysis and conventional in-center hemodialysis in Japan: A comparison of health-related quality of life
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Ohno, Yoichi
    Inoue, Tsutomu
    Takane, Hiroshi
    Okada, Hirokazu
    Suzuki, Hiromichi
    HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 18 : S32 - S38
  • [3] In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis Versus Conventional Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Wong, Ben
    Collister, David
    Muneer, Maliha
    Storie, Dale
    Courtney, Mark
    Lloyd, Anita
    Campbell, Sandra
    Pauly, Robert P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2017, 70 (02) : 218 - 234
  • [4] Effects of In-Center Nocturnal Versus Conventional Hemodialysis on Endothelial Dysfunction
    Jin, Xiucai
    Rong, Shu
    Mei, Changlin
    Ye, Chaoyang
    Chen, Jiabin
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2012, 16 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [5] Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Conventional In-center Hemodialysis
    Hingwala, Jay
    Tangri, Navdeep
    Rigatto, Claudio
    Komenda, Paul
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2015, 28 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [6] Patient Survival With Extended Home Hemodialysis Compared to In-Center Conventional Hemodialysis
    Ok, Ercan
    Demirci, Cenk
    Asci, Gulay
    Yuksel, Kivanc
    Kircelli, Fatih
    Koc, Serkan Kubilay
    Erten, Sinan
    Mahsereci, Erkan
    Odabas, Ali Riza
    Stuard, Stefano
    Maddux, Franklin W.
    Raimann, Jochen G.
    Kotanko, Peter
    Kerr, Peter G.
    Chan, Christopher T.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2023, 8 (12): : 2603 - 2615
  • [7] An economic assessment model for in-center, conventional home, and more frequent home hemodialysis
    Komenda, Paul
    Gavaghan, Meghan B.
    Garfield, Susan S.
    Poret, Amy W.
    Sood, Manish M.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 81 (03) : 307 - 313
  • [8] Survival with Three-Times Weekly In-Center Nocturnal Versus Conventional Hemodialysis
    Lacson, Eduardo, Jr.
    Xu, Jianglin
    Suri, Rita S.
    Nesrallah, Gihad
    Lindsay, Robert
    Garg, Amit X.
    Lester, Keith
    Ofsthun, Norma
    Lazarus, Michael
    Hakim, Raymond M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 23 (04): : 687 - 695
  • [9] QUALITY-OF-LIFE ON IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS VERSUS CAPD
    NISSENSON, AR
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 12 (02): : 264 - 265
  • [10] PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF IN-CENTER CONVERSION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO INTENSIFIED NOCTURNAL HEMODIALYSIS
    Clajus, Christian
    Clajus, Christian
    Kielstein, Jan T.
    Haller, Hermann
    David, Sascha
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 27 : 220 - 220