HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter

被引:53
|
作者
Chen, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Rong [2 ]
Deng, Wenning [2 ]
Gao, Chuanyu [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Xianqing [1 ]
Wang, Shunbao [1 ]
Fu, Haixia [1 ]
Zhao, Yonghui [1 ]
Zhang, Jiaying [1 ]
Dong, Jianzeng [2 ]
Ma, Changsheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; Catheter ablation; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ISTHMUS ABLATION; FOLLOW-UP; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; BLOCK; RISK; COMMON; SIZE; AF;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL); however, limited data are available for a risk prediction model for the future occurrence of AF in patients with typical AFL undergoing successful catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether the HATCH score (which is based on hypertension, age >= 75 years, transient ischemic attack or stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure) is useful for risk prediction of subsequent AF after ablation of typical AFL. METHODS A total of 216 consecutive patients presenting with typical AFL and no history of AF who underwent successful catheter ablation were enrolled in the study. The clinical endpoint was occurrence of new-onset AF during follow-up after ablation. RESULTS During a follow-up period of 29.1 +/- 18.3 months, 85 patients (39%) experienced at least 1 episode of AF. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the HATCH score (hazard ratio 1.784; 95% confidence interval 1.352-2.324; P < .001) and left atrial diameter (hazard ratio 1.270; 95% confidence interval 1.115-1.426; P < .001) were independently associated with new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the HATCH score for prediction of new-onset AF was 0.743. The HATCH score could be used to stratify the patients into 2 groups with different incidences of new-onset AF (69% vs 27%, P < .001) at a cutoff value of 2. CONCLUSIONS The HATCH score is a useful predictor of new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:1483 / 1489
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Simple Score to Predict New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter
    Gu, Zhoushan
    Jiao, Jincheng
    Shen, Youmei
    Ding, Xiangwei
    Zhu, Chao
    Li, Mingfang
    Chen, Hongwu
    Ju, Weizhu
    Gu, Kai
    Yang, Gang
    Liu, Hailei
    Kojodjojo, Pipin
    Chen, Minglong
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (09) : 1580 - 1589
  • [2] CHA2DS2-VASc score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with typical atrial flutter after catheter ablation
    Liu, Fei
    Xia, Yunlong
    Yin, Xiaomeng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (16) : C144 - C144
  • [3] New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation is Common After Radiofrequency Ablation for Isolated Typical Atrial Flutter
    Voight, Jessica
    Akkaya, Mehmet
    Somasundaram, Porur
    Karim, Rehan
    Adabag, Selcuk
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [4] CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter
    Liu, Fei
    Xin, Zechang
    Bin Waleed, Khalid
    Lin, Yajuan
    Tse, Gary
    Luhanga, Andrew
    Sun, Yuanjun
    Gao, Lianjun
    Yin, Xiaomeng
    Xia, Yunlong
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [5] Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke after radiofrequency ablation of isolated, typical atrial flutter
    Voight, Jessica
    Akkaya, Mehmet
    Somasundaram, Porur
    Karim, Rehan
    Valliani, Salimah
    Kwon, Younghoon
    Adabag, Selcuk
    HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (11) : 1884 - 1889
  • [6] Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
    Garcia-Seara, Javier
    Gude Sampedro, Francisco
    Martinez Sande, Jose L.
    Fernandez Lopez, Xesus Alberte
    Rodriguez Manero, Moises
    Gonzalez Melchor, Laila
    Alvarez Alvarez, Belen
    Iglesias Alvarez, Diego
    Gonzalez Juanatey, Jose Ramon
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2016, 12 : 88 - 94
  • [7] Usefulness of HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation for Asians
    Suenari, Kazuyoshi
    Chao, Tze-Fan
    Liu, Chia-Jen
    Kihara, Yasuki
    Chen, Tzeng-Ji
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (01)
  • [8] Implantable loop recorder for augmenting detection of new-onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation
    Peng, Gary
    Lin, Aung N.
    Obeng-Gyimah, Edmond
    Hall, Samantha N.
    Yang, Ya-Wen
    Chen, Shiquan
    Riley, Michael
    Deo, Rajat
    Ali, Aasima
    Arkles, Jeffery
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    Dixit, Sanjay
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2021, 2 (03): : 255 - 261
  • [9] Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter
    Celikyurt, Umut
    Knecht, Sven
    Kuehne, Michael
    Reichlin, Tobias
    Muehl, Aline
    Spies, Florian
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (11): : 1776 - 1780
  • [10] Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Post-cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Typical Atrial Flutter Without History of Atrial Fibrillation
    Li, Jia-hui
    Xie, Hai-yang
    Chen, Yan-qiao
    Cao, Zhong-jing
    Tang, Qing-hui
    Guo, Xiao-gang
    Sun, Qi
    Ma, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12