Radial vorticity constraint in core flow modeling

被引:10
|
作者
Asari, S. [1 ]
Lesur, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch GeoForschungsZentrum, Helmholtz Zentrum Potsdam, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
MAGNETIC-FIELD; SECULAR VARIATION; TORSIONAL OSCILLATIONS; GEOMAGNETIC JERKS; EARTHS CORE; FLUID-FLOW; SURFACE; TOP; MANTLE; STRATIFICATION;
D O I
10.1029/2011JB008267
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present a new method for estimating core surface flows by relaxing the tangentially geostrophic (TG) constraint. Ageostrophic flows are allowed if they are consistent with the radial component of the vorticity equation under assumptions of the magnetostrophic force balance and an insulating mantle. We thus derive a tangentially magnetostrophic (TM) constraint for flows in the spherical harmonic domain and implement it in a least squares inversion of GRIMM-2, a recently proposed core field model, for temporally continuous core flow models (2000.0-2010.0). Comparing the flows calculated using the TG and TM constraints, we show that the number of degrees of freedom for the poloidal flows is notably increased by admitting ageostrophic flows compatible with the TM constraint. We find a significantly improved fit to the GRIMM-2 secular variation (SV) by including zonal poloidal flow in TM flow models. Correlations between the predicted and observed length-of-day variations are equally good under the TG and TM constraints. In addition, we estimate flow models by imposing the TM constraint together with other dynamical constraints: either purely toroidal (PT) flow or helical flow constraint. For the PT case we cannot find any flow which explains the observed SV, while for the helical case the SV can be fitted. The poor compatibility between the TM and PT constraints seems to arise from the absence of zonal poloidal flows. The PT flow assumption is likely to be negated when the radial magnetostrophic vorticity balance is taken into account, even if otherwise consistent with magnetic observations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential vorticity constraint on the flow between two basins
    Yang, Jiayan
    Price, James F.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2007, 37 (09) : 2251 - 2266
  • [2] Surface vorticity modeling of flow around airfoils
    C. Xu
    Computational Mechanics, 1998, 21 : 526 - 532
  • [3] Surface vorticity modeling of flow around airfoils
    Xu, C
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 1998, 21 (06) : 526 - 532
  • [4] Vorticity fluxes and secondary flow: Relevance for turbulence modeling
    Vidal, A.
    Nagib, H. M.
    Vinuesa, R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2018, 3 (07):
  • [5] Radial Power Flow Tolerance Analysis by Interval Constraint Propagation
    Vaccaro, Alfredo
    Villacci, Domenico
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [6] Simulation of fiber entanglement by modeling vorticity in water flow field
    Xiang, Ping
    Kuznetsov, Andrey V.
    Seyam, Abdel-Fattah M.
    TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 77 (05) : 312 - 329
  • [7] Modeling vorticity stretching of viscoelastic droplets during shearing flow
    Almusallam, Abdulwahab S.
    Bini, T. B.
    JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY, 2021, 65 (06) : 1327 - 1345
  • [8] Radial basis function neural network model for mean velocity and vorticity of capillary flow
    El-Bakry, Mostafa Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2011, 67 (10) : 1283 - 1290
  • [9] Radial shear in the flow at the Earth's core surface
    Firsov, I
    Jault, D.
    Gillet, N.
    Aubert, J.
    Mandea, M.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 235 (03) : 2524 - 2539
  • [10] Modeling of turbulent flow through radial diffuser
    Deschamps, C.J.
    Prata, A.T.
    Ferreira, R.T.S.
    Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Mecanicas/Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences, 2000, 22 (01): : 31 - 41