Myocardial energy metabolism in ischemic preconditioning and cardioplegia:: A metabolic control analysis

For both, cardioplegia (CP) and ischemic preconditioning (IP), increased ischemic tolerance with reduction in infarct size is well documented. These cardioprotective effects are related to a limitation of high energy phosphate (HEP) depletion. As CP and IP have to be assumed to act by different mechanisms, their effects on myocardial HEP metabolism cannot be assumed to be identical. Therefore, a systematic analysis of myocardial HEP metabolism for both procedures and their combination was performed, addressing the question whether there are different effects on myocardial HEP metabolism by IP and CP. In this study, metabolic control analysis was used to analyze the regulation of HEP metabolism. In open chest pigs subjected to 45 min LAD occlusion ( index ischemia), CP and IP preserved myocardial ATP ( control ( C) 0.14 +/- 0.05 mu mol/ g wwt; CP: 0.95 +/- 0.14, IP: 0.61 +/- 0.12; p < 0.05 C vs. CP and IP) and reduced myocardial necrosis ( infarct size IA/RA: C: 90.0 +/- 3.0%; CP: 0.0 +/- 0.0% but patchy necroses; IP: 5.05 +/- 2.1%; p < 0.05 C vs. CP and IP). The effects on HEP metabolism, however, were different: CP acted predominantly by slowing down the breakdown of phosphocreatine (PCr) during early phases of ischemia ( C: Delta PCr 0 - 2 min: 5.24 +/- 0.32 mu mol/ g wwt; CP: Delta PCr 0 - 2 min: 3.38 +/- 0.23 eta mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C), leaving ATP breakdown during later stages unaffected ( C: Delta ATP 5 - 45 min: 1.77 +/- 0.11 mu mol/ g wwt CP: Delta ATP 5 - 45 min: 1.59 +/- 0.28 mu mol/ g wwt, n. s. vs. C). In contrast to CP, in IP PCr breakdown was even increased ( IP: Delta PCr 0 - 2 min: 7.06 +/- 0.34 mu mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C), but ATP depletion greatly attenuated ( IP: Delta ATP 5 - 45 min: 0.48 +/- 0.10 mu mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C and CP). Combining IP and CP yielded an additive effect with slowing down the breakdown of both PCr ( IP+ CP: Delta PCr 0 - 2 min: 5.09 +/- 0.35 mu mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C and IP) and ATP ( IP+ CP: Delta ATP 5 - 45 min: 0.56 +/- 0.48 mu mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C and CP), resulting in a higher ATP content at the end of index ischemia (1.86 +/- 0.46 mu mol/ g wwt, p < 0.05 vs. C, CP and IP). Compared to IP, combining IP+ CP achieved also a further reduction in infarct size (IA/RA: 0.0 +/- 0.0%, p < 0.05 vs IP) and - compared to CP - a disappearance of the patchy necroses. The concept of major differences in myocardial HEP metabolism during CP and IP is further supported at a molecular level by metabolic control analysis. CP but not IP slowed down the CK reaction velocity at high PCr levels. In contrast to CP exerting a continuous decline in vATPase for any given ATP level, in IP myocardium ATPase reaction velocity was even increased at higher ATP contents, whereas a marked decrease in ATPase reaction velocity was found if ATP levels decreased. The equilibrium of the CK-reaction remained unchanged following CP, whereas IP induced a changing CK equilibrium, which was the more shifted towards PCr the more myocardial HEP content decreased. The data demonstrate different effects of CP and IP on myocardial HEP metabolism, i.e. PCr and ATP breakdown as well as the apparent equilibrium of the creatine kinase (CK)-reaction. For these reasons the combination of the two protective interventions has an additive effect.